2000
DOI: 10.12935/jvma1951.53.289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Nutritional Condition on the Basis of Milk Urea Nitrogen and Milk Protein Concentrations in Dairy Cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Positive beliefs scores also correlated positively with milk urea nitrogen, which is used as an indicator of the balance between energy and protein in feed. A proper milk urea nitrogen concentration range is approximately 10-18 mg/dL (Ikuta et al 2000); however, in the current study the average milk urea nitrogen among the respondents was relatively lower (9.25 ± 1.72 mg/dL). A positive correlation between the positive beliefs score and milk urea nitrogen would suggest that farmers with lower positive beliefs scores fed their cows feed with protein content that was relatively lower than its energy content.…”
Section: Relationship Between Farmer's Attitude and Dairy Productivitcontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Positive beliefs scores also correlated positively with milk urea nitrogen, which is used as an indicator of the balance between energy and protein in feed. A proper milk urea nitrogen concentration range is approximately 10-18 mg/dL (Ikuta et al 2000); however, in the current study the average milk urea nitrogen among the respondents was relatively lower (9.25 ± 1.72 mg/dL). A positive correlation between the positive beliefs score and milk urea nitrogen would suggest that farmers with lower positive beliefs scores fed their cows feed with protein content that was relatively lower than its energy content.…”
Section: Relationship Between Farmer's Attitude and Dairy Productivitcontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…In dairy cattle, the nutritional status is usually monitored using the lactating quantity and quality as a criterion because the genetic diversity of cows is relatively large and the lactating periods are not the same among individual cows (DePeters and Cant, 1992;Ikuta et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%