2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of nonlinear optical differences between breast cancer cell lines SK-BR-3 and MCF-7; an in vitro study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we also observed low miR-92b and high XIST expression concurrently in breast cancer tissues and cell lines. These findings were in agreement with several studies on XIST and miR-92b expression in tumors [13][14][15][36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, we also observed low miR-92b and high XIST expression concurrently in breast cancer tissues and cell lines. These findings were in agreement with several studies on XIST and miR-92b expression in tumors [13][14][15][36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We report that lncRNA XIST (X-inactive-specific transcript), which is involved in genomic imprinting and the transcriptional silencing of genes on the X chromosome and is highly expressed in tumor tissues [11][12][13][14][15], is an epigenetic regulator targeted by miR-7 that directly bound and inhibited XIST expression in breast cancer by using the RNA in vivo precipitation (RIP) method, which underlies the attenuation of properties of BCSCs and the decrease of the BCSC subset. MiR-7 also modulated the miR-92b/Slug/ESA (epithelium-specific antigen) axis and reduced CD44 and Slug expression, resulting in a decrease in cancer cell stemness and the BCSC subset in breast cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at 24 and 48 h, a positive refractive nonlinearity was witnessed with a structure of prefocal valley and postfocal peak, which is because of the effect of selffocusing. While this switching of the sign was previously observed in breast cancer cell lines, organic dyes, and other materials, 23,25,45 this feature has never been used as a marker toward identifying different conformations of a protein. We noted that this remarkable sign change in the case of α-syn first occurs at 24 h, and this time window also corresponds to where the late oligomers start forming.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…From the past approximately three decades, the Z-scan technique is extensively recognized in the community of nonlinear optics as a standard experimental method to determine nonlinear parameters, owing to its simplicity and high sensitivity. Principally, a sample is scanned across the focal plane of a focused Gaussian beam, and the transmittance through the sample is measured, at the far-field, as a function of its position ( z ). If the transmittance profile is measured by means of a finite circular aperture in front of the detector, it is termed a closed-aperture (CA) Z-scan technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Compared with the MCF-7 cell line, the MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3, and LD cell lines exhibited high expression of ESAM and low expression of miR-7. It is known that MCF-7 cells are duct cell carcinoma with estrogen receptor (ER + ), progesterone receptor (PR + ), and epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2 À ), 16 while the MDA-MB-231 cells are ER À /PR À /HER2 À (triple-negative breast cancer cells), the SK-BR-3 cells are ER À /PR À /HER2 + , 17,18 and the LD cells are ER + /PR + /HER2 + . Owing to the high expression of ESAM, a molecule tightly related to tumor cell metastasis, the cells with high ESAM expression may pose a higher capability of invasion and metastasis than do the MCF-7 cells, which are relative low malignancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%