2011
DOI: 10.13031/2013.38199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Modern Cotton Harvest Systems on Irrigated Cotton: Yarn Quality

Abstract: The effects of harvest methods (cotton picker vs. cotton stripper) on yarn quality from irrigated cotton harvested on the High Plains of Texas with modern equipment was measured using multiple cultivars from six sites over three years. Few differences were detected in carded yarn quality between harvest treatments, while more pronounced differences favoring picked cotton were seen in combed yarns, especially when fibers were immature. During both 2006 and 2007, the evenness of combed yarns was improved by pick… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were in agreement with the increased presence of impurities due to clamping plates noted by Belot and Vilela (2006) and Willcutt et al (2006). These results also indicated the presence of bark similar to that obtained by Faulkner et al (2011) and Sui et al (2010) with values ranging between 1 and 4% for harvesters using a picker system. Sui et al (2010) state that the separation and the cleaning process of the cotton fibers needs to be more aggressive as increasing the peel can contribute to increasing the amount of short fibers in the samples.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These results were in agreement with the increased presence of impurities due to clamping plates noted by Belot and Vilela (2006) and Willcutt et al (2006). These results also indicated the presence of bark similar to that obtained by Faulkner et al (2011) and Sui et al (2010) with values ranging between 1 and 4% for harvesters using a picker system. Sui et al (2010) state that the separation and the cleaning process of the cotton fibers needs to be more aggressive as increasing the peel can contribute to increasing the amount of short fibers in the samples.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Ring spinning was accomplished on a Suessen Elite ring‐spinning frame, following the protocol outlined by Faulkner et al (2011) but modified to accommodate the longer upland fiber lengths in this study. Specific modifications were (i) the card was operated at 400 rpm for the pima entry rather than 460 rpm for the upland entries; and (ii) the draft of the draw frames was adjusted for each entry, based on their fiber length.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in fiber length exists within a sample, and this variation, along with the ones in other fiber properties, may affect the quality of the finished product (Wakeham 1955;Koo and Moon 1999). Cotton fibers exhibit natural variation in length due to the environment, agronomic practices, and genetic factors (Stewart 1975;Basra 1999;Faulkner et al 2011). The length of a cotton fiber will be at its maximum just before the boll opens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%