2017
DOI: 10.1002/met.1620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of model‐generated vertical profiles of meteorological variables: method and initial results

Abstract: Meteorological centres compare global and large-scale regional model output versus radiosonde data more or less continuously for specific models and also make inter-model comparisons. They normally provide comparisons of meteorological variables at standard pressure levels, and similar comparisons for finer-scale models may be found as output from field tests and other experiments. Additional means to evaluate vertical profiles derived from model output more fully should help provide a more complete evaluation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Model results are presented in a form of vertical profiles with wind speeds and are compared with observations at the two sounding sites (Figure 2). This approach is often used in modelling studies as an alternative to a more detailed post-processing method involving interpolation of both model results and observations to a fixed set of pre-selected heights [63]. Time series with daily mean concentrations of birch (Betula) pollen (with and without feedback) are compared with observations at the 6 monitoring sites (Figure 3) series with daily mean concentrations of birch (Betula) pollen (with and without feedback) and compared with observations at the 6 monitoring sites (Figure 3).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model results are presented in a form of vertical profiles with wind speeds and are compared with observations at the two sounding sites (Figure 2). This approach is often used in modelling studies as an alternative to a more detailed post-processing method involving interpolation of both model results and observations to a fixed set of pre-selected heights [63]. Time series with daily mean concentrations of birch (Betula) pollen (with and without feedback) are compared with observations at the 6 monitoring sites (Figure 3) series with daily mean concentrations of birch (Betula) pollen (with and without feedback) and compared with observations at the 6 monitoring sites (Figure 3).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vertical profiles were extracted from the WRF output files via an NCL script. Cogan (, ) describes the programme for conversion of RAOB or WRF soundings into METCMs and various other types of meteorological profiles. That software also produces a form of the METCM that is suitable for input to the GTRAJ trajectory simulation programme.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, METCMs were derived from both WRF‐based profiles and RAOB soundings. The generation of vertical profiles for the METCM is based on algorithms implemented in software described by Cogan (, ). That software package processes model data or RAOB soundings into various forms including the METCM.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation