Evaluation of Microleakage of Roots Filled With Different Techniques With a Computerized Fluid Filtration Technique

Sağsen, Burak; Er, Orhan; Kahraman, Yasemin; Oruçoğlu, Hasan

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2006.07.016

Cited by 54 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 28 publications

(29 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The higher the sealer line is, the greater its disintegration and consequent marginal infiltration occurs [19,20]. Similar results were also observed by Sagsen et al [21].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Comparison of bacterial leakage between Epiphany and AH Plus sealers using single cone and Tagger’s hybrid obturation techniques

Rodrigues

Affonso

Vieira

et al. 2015

Rev. Odonto Ciênc. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate and compare, by means of bacterial infiltration, the quality of sealing obtained by Tagger's hybrid (TH) and Single Cone (SC) techniques, in association with AH Plus/Gutta-percha (AH) and Epiphany/Resilon (ER). Methods: Palatal roots of 70 maxillary molars were instrumented and divided randomly into six groups: G1, TH/AH; G2, SC/AH; G3, TH/ER; G4, SC/ER; G5, negative control; G6, positive control. The roots were sterilized and monitored for 56 days to detect bacterial leakage using Enterococcus faecalis. The data were subjected to Binomial test (α<0.05) to compare the infiltration among groups and Kruskal-Wallis test (α<0.05) to analyze the infiltration as a function of time.Results: All positive controls leaked within 24 h; none of negative controls leaked. There was no influence of time on leakage. Individual comparisons showed that there were no influences of the techniques and filling materials on quality of root canal sealing. Significant difference was found only between G1 and G4 (p=0.0229), the G1 showed a lesser and G2 the higher quantity of infiltration. Conclusion: It could be concluded that none of the groups was able to prevent bacterial leakage and the lowest ability to prevent infiltration was obtained when applied SC/ER to filling the canal.Key words: Bacteria; Dental materials; Endodontic; Root canal obturation; Dental leakage.Comparação da infiltração bacteriana entre os cimentos Epiphany e AH Plus usando as técnicas de obturação de cone único e Híbrida de Tagger Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar e comparar, por meio da infiltração bacteriana, a qualidade de selamento obtido pelas técnicas híbrida de Tagger (TH) e do cone único (SC) associadas com AH Plus/Guta-percha (AH) e Epiphany/Resilon (ER) . Métodos: Raízes palatinas de 70 molares superiores foram instrumentadas e divididas aleatoriamente em seis grupos: G1, TH/AH; G2, SC/AH; G3, TH/ER; G4, SC/ER; G5, controle negativo; G6, controle positivo. As raízes foram esterilizadas e monitoradas durante 56 dias para detectar a infiltração bacteriana utilizando Enterococcus faecalis. Os dados foram submetidos a teste Binomial (α<0,05) ao comparar a infiltração entre grupos e Kruskal-Wallis (α<0,05) para analisar a infiltração, como uma função do tempo. Resultados: Todos os controles positivos infiltraram em 24 horas. Nenhum dos controles negativos infiltrou. Não houve influência do tempo na infiltração. Comparações individuais mostraram não haver influencia das técnicas e materiais de obturação na qualidade de selamento do canal radicular. Houve diferença significativa apenas entre G1 e G4 (P=0,0229), o G1 mostrou o menor e G4 a maior quantidade de infiltração. Conclusão: Nenhum dos grupos foi capaz de evitar a infiltração bacteriana e a menor capacidade de prevenir a infiltração foi obtida quando utilizados de SC/ER para obturar o canal.Palavras-chave: Bactérias, materiais dentários, endodontia, obturação do canal radicular, infiltração dentária. 88Rev Odonto Cienc 2014;29(3):87-91Assessment of bacterial leakage when using dif...

show abstract

“…The higher the sealer line is, the greater its disintegration and consequent marginal infiltration occurs [19,20]. Similar results were also observed by Sagsen et al [21].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Comparison of bacterial leakage between Epiphany and AH Plus sealers using single cone and Tagger’s hybrid obturation techniques

Rodrigues

Affonso

Vieira

et al. 2015

Rev. Odonto Ciênc. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The leakage observed in specimens filled with AH Plus was similar to that observed in the fillings with Sealapex and MTA Fillapex. Xu et al 19 and Sagsen et al 20 reported similar results. However, a previous study reported lower leakage values in specimens filled with Sealapex, compared with AH Plus, after 15 days of sealing.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 58%

Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of drying protocols (DP) on the apical sealing (AS) and on the bond strength (BS) of teeth filled with different sealers. The root canals of one hundred and fifty-six roots of maxillary canines were prepared with Reciproc rotary files (R50). The teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 39), according to the DP: GI-paper points; GII-70% isopropyl alcohol + aspiration with NaviTip points; GIII-95% ethanol + paper points; GIV-EndoVac + paper points. Each group was divided into subgroups, according to the sealer used: AH Plus, Sealapex and MTA Fillapex, using a single-cone technique. Evaluation of AS and BS was performed with fluid filtration (FF) and push-out (PO) methods, respectively. The PO test consisted of sectioning the roots, and subjecting a single slice from each third to testing and analysis for failure type. The data was submitted to two-way and three-way variance analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey (α = 5%). The AS showed no drying protocol influence. The FF results revealed a statistically significant difference between MTA and Sealapex (p < 0.05) sealers. The BS test values showed that there was no statistical significant difference among the canal thirds (p > 0.05), but that there was such a difference among the sealers (p < 0.05), among the protocols (p < 0.05), and in the interaction between sealers and protocols (p < 0.05). AH Plus revealed the highest BS values among the sealers; the highest BS results for the sealers occurred with the specimens used with isopropyl alcohol, compared with ethanol and EndoVac.

show abstract

“…The internal anatomy and especially the complexity of the root canal system (RCS) must be considered during the therapy because many studies have shown a high prevalence of ramifications in the teeth analyzed (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Several techniques and materials have been studied to improve the three-dimensional filling and provide an increase in the success rate of the endodontic treatment (1,(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). According to Schilder (1), the warm vertical condensation of gutta-percha offers a technique that produces a homogeneous and dimensionally stable mass of gutta-percha, allowing this material to penetrate the RCS ramifications.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Study on the Frequency, Location, and Direction of Accessory Canals Filled With the Hydraulic Vertical Condensation and Continuous Wave of Condensation Techniques

Barbosa

Gusman

Araújo

2009

Journal of Endodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of Microleakage of Roots Filled With Different Techniques With a Computerized Fluid Filtration Technique

Cited by 54 publications

References 28 publications

Comparison of bacterial leakage between Epiphany and AH Plus sealers using single cone and Tagger’s hybrid obturation techniques

Comparison of bacterial leakage between Epiphany and AH Plus sealers using single cone and Tagger’s hybrid obturation techniques

Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers

A Comparative Study on the Frequency, Location, and Direction of Accessory Canals Filled With the Hydraulic Vertical Condensation and Continuous Wave of Condensation Techniques

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About