Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems

Cardoso, Paulo Eduardo Capel; Braga, Roberta da Rocha; Carrilho, Marcela Rocha de Oliveira

doi:10.1016/s0300-5712(99)00012-3

Cited by 126 publications

(77 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The use of 10-MDP (CSEB) instead of Phenyl-P (Clearfil Liner Bond 2) may be the main reason for the better bonding attained by CSEB when compared to Clearfil Liner Bond 2. 33 The performance of E&P on dentin has been shown to be similar to that of other adhesive systems that require acid etching, such as SBMP 1 or Prime & Bond NT. 45 In the present study, SBMP and E&P showed higher leakage on the gingival than on the occlusal margin, in line with other studies.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Microleakage and interfacial morphology of self‐etching adhesives in class V resin composite restorations

et al. 2003

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the marginal leakage of three adhesive systems in Class V resin composite restorations. Two adhesive systems containing acidic primers: Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB) and Etch & Prime 3.0 (E&P), were compared with a conventional water-based primer: Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (SBMP). Class V cavities were made at the cementum-enamel junction of extracted human molars, which were then divided between three groups. One of the adhesive systems was applied to each group following manufacturers' instructions. Composite restorations were placed, light cured for 40 s, and polished. Specimens were then immersed in a solution of 2% basic fuchsin dye for 24 h. Longitudinal sections were obtained and studied with a stereomicroscope for assessment of the microleakage according to the degree of dye penetration (scale of 0 -3). Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA, Mann-Whitney tests, and the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Two specimens for each group were analyzed by scanningelectron microscopy (SEM). Bonded interfaces of dentin were also examined by transmissionelectron microscopy (TEM). On enamel, there were no significant differences between the three groups. On dentin, CSEB showed the lowest dye penetration values among the three adhesive systems. SEM and TEM studies showed hybrid layer and resin tag formations in all groups.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…1 In composite restorations, bonding to different tooth substrates is variable. Enamel is a reliable substrate for bonding, 2 but bonding to dentin remains somewhat less reliable or predictable.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Microleakage and interfacial morphology of self‐etching adhesives in class V resin composite restorations

et al. 2003

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…. 따라서 최근 에는 시편을 trimming하지 않고 12,36) 막대모양 (stick)의 시편을 제작하여 미세인장 강도검사에 사용되고 있 다 6,12,19,37,38) . 이러한 방법은 시편을 trimming하지 않기 때 문에 아주 간단하게 시편을 제작할 수 있고, 또한 하나의 치 아에서 다수의 시편을 만들 수 있는 장점을 가지고 있다 19) .…”

Section: ⅳ 총괄 및 고찰unclassified

Influence of appication time of self-etching primers on dentinal microtensile bond strength

Cho

Lee

Kim

et al. 2004

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluated the influence of application time of self-etching primers on microtensile bond strength (μ TBS) to dentin using three self-etching primer adhesive systems.Dentin surfaces were exposed from forty-eight human molars. They were conditioned with three self-etching primers (Clearfil SE Bond [SE], Unifil Bond [UF], Tyrian SPE + One Step Plus [TY]) and different primining times (10s, 20s, 30s and 40s). Composite resins were bonded to dentin surfaces and specimens were made. μ TBS was tested and statistically compared using by one-way ANOVA and Tukey' s Test.The results of this study presented that priming time for 10s in SE and UF groups and for 30s and 40s in TY group was highly decreased μ TBS to dentin. [J Kor Acad Cons Dent 29(5): [430][431][432][433][434][435][436][437][438] 2004]

show abstract

“…Strong, durable adhesion between the restorative material and tooth is essential, as the adequate adaptation of the material reduces microleakage, pulp irritation and risk of caries recurrence 8 . Shear bond strength tests are the method of choice in the assessment of restorative materials, especially traction and shear strength tests [9][10] . The difficulty of performing a strength test in the oral cavity has led most researchers to the use of extracted teeth 9 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of acid etching on shear strength of different glass ionomer cements

Bortoletto¹,

Miranda

Motta³

et al. 2013

Braz. J. Oral Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To assess the influence of dental etching on the shear strength of different glass ionomer cements. Methods: The crown of 60 bovine incisors was prepared to obtain a flat, smooth surface, were attached to a PVC tube and randomly divided into six groups: Group 1 -Riva Self Cure without etching; Group II -Riva Self Cure with pre-etching; Group III -Maxxion R without etching; Group IV -Maxxion R with pre-etching; Group V -Ketac™Molar Easymix without etching; and Group VI -Ketac™Molar Easymix with pre-etching. Etching was performed with 10% polyacrylic acid for 30 s. A standardizing device was used for preparation of the test specimens (SBS Test Method). Following preparation, the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37º C for 24 h. The shear test was performed on a Kratos universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The specimens were then viewed under a stereomicroscope at a magnification of x90 for analysis of fractures. Results: The results revealed that pre-etching increased the shear strength of Riva glass ionomer cement (SDI) alone, whereas no statistically significant differences were found with regard to the other materials tested. Conclusions: Pre-etching with 10% polyacrylic acid for 30 s increased the shear strength of Riva glass ionomer cement.

show abstract

Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems

Cited by 126 publications

References 6 publications

Microleakage and interfacial morphology of self‐etching adhesives in class V resin composite restorations

Microleakage and interfacial morphology of self‐etching adhesives in class V resin composite restorations

Influence of appication time of self-etching primers on dentinal microtensile bond strength

Influence of acid etching on shear strength of different glass ionomer cements

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About