2004
DOI: 10.3133/sir20045068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Methods Used for Estimating Selected Streamflow Statistics, and Flood Frequency and Magnitude, for Small Basins in North Coastal California

Abstract: Appendix 1. Matrix of study station and index station pairings for both daily value regressions for streamflow statistic adjustment and two-station adjustment for flood frequency analysis ……………………………………………………………… Appendix 2. SWRCB and USGS hydrographs of mean daily flows for all stations with estimates provided by SWRCB ………………………………………………… Appendix 3. Computed relative standard errors plotted versus basin characteristics for all stations' 25-and 50-percentile December 15 to March 31 mean-daily-flow estimates …… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(2 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mann et al. () compute a median percentage difference of −13.2% between the measured and estimated mean daily average discharge among 40 small USGS‐gauged North Coastal California drainages, and a −28% difference between mid‐December and March 31. Saraeva and Hardy () found similar magnitudes of error.…”
Section: Modified Percent Of Flow Approachsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Mann et al. () compute a median percentage difference of −13.2% between the measured and estimated mean daily average discharge among 40 small USGS‐gauged North Coastal California drainages, and a −28% difference between mid‐December and March 31. Saraeva and Hardy () found similar magnitudes of error.…”
Section: Modified Percent Of Flow Approachsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Elder Creek À20.1%; and South Fork Eel at Branscomb 3.1% (Figure 6). These errors fall within or below the range reported by Mann et al (2004). The shape of the Bull Creek and Elder Creek estimated baselines was similar to the empirical site-specific curves ( Figure 6) Promising work has been undertaken to improve estimates at ungauged basins using process-based modelling (Dralle, Karst, & Thompson, 2016;M€ uller et al, 2014).…”
Section: Percent Of the Streamflow Baselinesupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations