2013
DOI: 10.5849/forsci.12-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Methods to Predict Weibull Parameters for Characterizing Diameter Distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
67
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
4
67
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have implemented ABAs, ITD methods or a hybrid of the two approaches to predict stem diameter distributions (e.g., [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][21][22][23][24][25]28]). We have used an allometry-based modelling approach coupled with Bayesian model-fitting techniques to predict stem diameter distributions and proportions of broadleaved and coniferous species from airborne LiDAR ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have implemented ABAs, ITD methods or a hybrid of the two approaches to predict stem diameter distributions (e.g., [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][21][22][23][24][25]28]). We have used an allometry-based modelling approach coupled with Bayesian model-fitting techniques to predict stem diameter distributions and proportions of broadleaved and coniferous species from airborne LiDAR ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While parametric strategies are advantageous in being able to represent a complete distribution with a few parameters when the empirical distribution is unimodal, they may have limited ability to represent complex and mixed species stands that may not have unimodal densities [18]. Empirical strategies which retain the original data or relative densities by dbh bins provide more flexibility to accommodate many types of stand tables [17], however, some prediction strategies for multiple dbh percentiles can result in illogical behavior, benefitting from the introduction of constraints [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baldwin and Feduccia 1987;Borders et al 1987;Maltamo et al 2000;Cao 2004;Poudel and Cao 2013). However, few studies, to date, have pointed out the relationship between measures of variability (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baldwin and Feduccia 1987;Cao 2004;Poudel and Cao 2013;Siipilehto and Mehtatalo 2013). The recurring conclusion from these studies is that the PRM seems to be a better approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%