Zarys treści. W artykule pokazano najbardziej istotne podziały terytorium dzisiejszego państwa czeskiego pod kątem ich subiektywnej percepcji przez samych Czechów oraz róż-nic w porównaniu z podziałami występującymi w Polsce. Autor koncentruje się na różnicach w percepcji dychotomii terytorialnych: 'stolica-peryferie', 'miasto-wieś', 'pogranicze zasiedlone dawniej przez Niemców (potocznie nazywane Sudetami)-wnętrze kraju' oraz na postrzeganiu regionów kulturowo-historycznych, religijnych i administracyjnych. Wszystkie opisywane kwestie są udokumentowane danymi statystycznymi oraz własnymi badaniami i długoletnimi obserwacjami autora.Słowa kluczowe: podział terytorialny, Czechy, percepcja, mapy mentalne, regiony kulturowe, regiony administracyjne. WstępW większości krajów świata o powierzchni większej niż np. powierzchnia Luksemburga można zaobserwować mniej lub bardziej wyraziste podziały wewnętrzne, których hierarchia i złożoność jest zwykle proporcjonalna do obszaru, jaki dany kraj zajmuje na powierzchni Ziemi. Południowy sąsiad Polski -Republika Czeska -jest jednym ze średniej wielkości krajów Europy, a w kontekście globalnym należy do mniejszych. Przy generalizacji koniecznej w wypadku opracowań w większej skali kraj ten jest zwykle postrzegany jako stosunkowo jednolity region geograficzny. Ale gdy przyjrzymy się bliżej, wyłaniają się jego wewnętrzne podziały. Może ich być tak wiele, że trudno wybrać najistotniejsze, które determinują czeską strukturę regionalną. Niektóre z nich są bardziej, a inne mniej widoczne; jedne są podobne do podziałów w innych krajach, inne zaś specyficzne, typowo czeskie. Można przeanalizować niektóre aspekty wewnętrznego zróżnicowania, jak zrobili to m.in. geografowie z Ołomuńca (Halás i Klapka, 2010), trudno jednak wybrać metodę umożliwiającą określenie, które regionalne podziały kraju są najistotniejsze.
Scientific research requires the collection of data in order to study, monitor, analyze, describe, or understand a particular process or event. Data collection efforts are often a compromise: manual measurements can be time-consuming and labor-intensive, resulting in data being collected at a low frequency, while automating the data-collection process can reduce labor requirements and increase the frequency of measurements, but at the cost of added expense of electronic data-collecting instrumentation. Rapid advances in electronic technologies have resulted in a variety of new and inexpensive sensing, monitoring, and control capabilities which offer opportunities for implementation in agricultural and natural-resource research applications. An Open Source Hardware project called Arduino consists of a programmable microcontroller development platform, expansion capability through add-on boards, and a programming development environment for creating custom microcontroller software. All circuit-board and electronic component specifications, as well as the programming software, are open-source and freely available for anyone to use or modify. Inexpensive sensors and the Arduino development platform were used to develop several inexpensive, automated sensing and datalogging systems for use in agricultural and natural-resources related research projects. Systems were developed and implemented to monitor soil-moisture status of field crops for irrigation scheduling and crop-water use studies, to measure daily evaporation-pan water levels for quantifying evaporative demand, and to monitor environmental parameters under forested conditions. These studies demonstrate the usefulness of automated measurements, and offer guidance for other researchers in developing inexpensive sensing and monitoring systems to further their research.
There is a general assumption that intraspecific populations originating from relatively arid climates will be better adapted to cope with the expected increase in drought from climate change. For ecologically and economically important species, more comprehensive, genecological studies that utilize large distributions of populations and direct measures of traits associated with drought-resistance are needed to empirically support this assumption because of the implications for the natural or assisted regeneration of species. We conducted a space-for-time substitution, common garden experiment with 35 populations of coast Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii) growing at three test sites with distinct summer temperature and precipitation (referred to as 'cool/moist', 'moderate', or 'warm/dry') to test the hypotheses that (i) there is large genetic variation among populations and regions in traits associated with drought-resistance, (ii) the patterns of genetic variation are related to the native source-climate of each population, in particular with summer temperature and precipitation, (iii) the differences among populations and relationships with climate are stronger at the warm/dry test site owing to greater expression of drought-resistance traits (i.e., a genotype × environment interaction). During midsummer 2012, we measured the rate of water loss after stomatal closure (transpiration(min)), water deficit (% below turgid saturation), and specific leaf area (SLA, cm(2) g(-1)) on new growth of sapling branches. There was significant genetic variation in all plant traits, with populations originating from warmer and drier climates having greater drought-resistance (i.e., lower transpiration(min), water deficit and SLA), but these trends were most clearly expressed only at the warm/dry test site. Contrary to expectations, populations from cooler climates also had greater drought-resistance across all test sites. Multiple regression analysis indicated that Douglas-fir populations from regions with relatively cool winters and arid summers may be most adapted to cope with drought conditions that are expected in the future.
Many temperate and boreal tree species have a chilling requirement, that is, they need to experience cold temperatures during fall and winter to burst bud normally in the spring. Results from trials with 11 Pacific Northwest tree species are consistent with the concept that plants can accumulate both chilling and forcing units simultaneously during the dormant season and they exhibit a tradeoff between amount of forcing and chilling. That is, the parallel model of chilling and forcing was effective in predicting budburst and well chilled plants require less forcing for bud burst than plants which have received less chilling. Genotypes differed in the shape of the possibility line which describes the quantitative tradeoff between chilling and forcing units. Plants which have an obligate chilling requirement (Douglas-fir, western hemlock, western larch, pines, and true firs) and received no or very low levels of chilling did not burst bud normally even with long photoperiods. Pacific madrone and western redcedar benefited from chilling in terms of requiring less forcing to promote bud burst but many plants burst bud normally without chilling. Equations predicting budburst were developed for each species in our trials for a portion of western North America under current climatic conditions and for 2080. Mean winter temperature was predicted to increase 3.2–5.5°C and this change resulted in earlier predicted budburst for Douglas-fir throughout much of our study area (up to 74 days earlier) but later budburst in some southern portions of its current range (up to 48 days later) as insufficient chilling is predicted to occur. Other species all had earlier predicted dates of budburst by 2080 than currently. Recent warming trends have resulted in earlier budburst for some woody plant species; however, the substantial winter warming predicted by some climate models will reduce future chilling in some locations such that budburst will not consistently occur earlier.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.