10th IEEE Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing, 2004. Proceedings.
DOI: 10.1109/prdc.2004.1276581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of memory built-in self repair techniques for high defect density technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The organization of a testable and repairable memory array equipped with a BISD/BIST diagnostic module, a BIRA module for allocating spare elements, and a BISR circuit for reconfiguring decoders and peripheral memory circuits. Some simulation tools for evaluating the e ciency of an MRA have been developed and proposed by Virage Logic [11,12], National Tsing Hua University [13,14,15,16,17], and others [4,19,20,21,22]. One of the main drawbacks of the proposed approaches is that, to reduce the simulation complexity, they limit realistic faults into memory devices, and do not enable the MRA evaluation under an elevated number of di↵erent faulty memory configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The organization of a testable and repairable memory array equipped with a BISD/BIST diagnostic module, a BIRA module for allocating spare elements, and a BISR circuit for reconfiguring decoders and peripheral memory circuits. Some simulation tools for evaluating the e ciency of an MRA have been developed and proposed by Virage Logic [11,12], National Tsing Hua University [13,14,15,16,17], and others [4,19,20,21,22]. One of the main drawbacks of the proposed approaches is that, to reduce the simulation complexity, they limit realistic faults into memory devices, and do not enable the MRA evaluation under an elevated number of di↵erent faulty memory configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, we may assume that it is reconstructed at each power up time by scanning memory reflecting the changing memory status. Fig 3 shows the overhead of using defect map compared with the existing redundancy approach in [4] and [5] for 100% embedded SRAM yield. Note that the Y-axis in Fig 2 is a log scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The redundancy scheme in [4] can at most repair only 0.003% defects thus the data used for that level of defects is based on approach in [4]. For higher defect rates we used the data from [5]. The defect map can be implemented in one of two ways: (1) using CAM (Content-Addressable Memory) and (2) using a tag bit for every data word (TAG).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%