2010
DOI: 10.1504/ijcibsb.2010.031392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of machine learning techniques for prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the ensemble framework was also compared to the typical previous CAD, which has been widely used in most of the previous studies [8], [9], [23]. However, the typical CAD had been focused on the study of the application of the single based solutions.…”
Section: B Empirical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, the ensemble framework was also compared to the typical previous CAD, which has been widely used in most of the previous studies [8], [9], [23]. However, the typical CAD had been focused on the study of the application of the single based solutions.…”
Section: B Empirical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Texture-based CADs utilize the spatial distribution of the pixels in the tissue image to distinguish malignant from benign tissue or discerning the Gleason grades. For instance, the most conventional texture analysis for tissue image classification are co-occurrence matrices [20], [21] such as in [9], [22], [23] and fractal analysis [24], [25]. The Fractal analysis is used to describe the texture roughness at a specific location, analyze variations of intensity and texture complexity in tissue images [24], [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There has been a wealth of work over the past twenty years to classify histological patterns in different disease sites and cancer types (e.g. Gleason Grade in prostate cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, lymphoma and neuroblastoma) using statistical methods and machine and deep learning techniques [ 154 ], [ 169 ], [ 170 ].…”
Section: Processing Analysis and Understanding In Digital Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State-of-the-art CAD systems and methods for microscopy include a real-time decision support system for diagnosis of rare cancers [ 13 ]; a system for discrimination of normal from benign thyroid nodules in cytological images [ 14 ]; a system for detection and grading of carcinoma in histology images [ 15 ]; a method for prostate cancer diagnosis and grading [ 16 ]; a web-based software framework for segmentation of cervical cell nuclei in high-resolution microscopy images [ 17 ]; and a tool for classification of biological microscopic images of lung tissue sections with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [ 18 ]. These works indicate that texture plays an important role in the characterization of the content of microscopy images and that machine learning can be effective for automatic annotation of such images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%