2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Invisalign treatment effectiveness and efficiency compared with conventional fixed appliances using the Peer Assessment Rating index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
70
1
13

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
70
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…However, though the velocity of tooth movement by CAT (commonly 0.2 mm every 10‐14 days) could be slower than by FAT (generally 1 mm per month), it might cause less ERR. Moreover, studies have shown that treatment duration of CAT was comparable to that of FAT or even shorter …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, though the velocity of tooth movement by CAT (commonly 0.2 mm every 10‐14 days) could be slower than by FAT (generally 1 mm per month), it might cause less ERR. Moreover, studies have shown that treatment duration of CAT was comparable to that of FAT or even shorter …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method of treatment for simple cases is equally effective as conventional fixed appliances. Conventional fixed appliances have been more effective in malocclusion treating, but treating with clear aligners is 30 % faster 24 and they are barely visible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…77 Chung et al came to a similar conclusion after observing 11 patients for 3 months. 79 To sum up, due to the differences in the protocols of the experiments conducted, further research is needed, focusing, among other things, on harmonizing the radiation dose.…”
Section: Photobiomodulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conclusions can be drawn based only on the differences in therapy duration and cases assessed using various indices, such as the peer assessment rating (PAR) or the objective grading system (OGS). 79,80 Gu et al found the Invisalign system (Align Technology Inc., San Jose, USA) to be advantageous in correcting minor orthodontic defects; the duration of treatment with the same effects was 30% (5.7 months) shorter compared to fixed braces. 79 Buschang et al reached similar conclusions: in a study of 150 patients with incisor crowding under 5 mm (the study group), they noted that the duration of therapy was reduced by 5.5 months.…”
Section: Clear Aligners and Self-ligating Bracketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation