2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of interfractional variation of organs and displacement of catheters during high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that for any three-fraction prescription regimen, a Day 2 verification image adds value to assessing inter-fraction changes. The results of this study also reinforce the findings of previous adaptive planning studies indicating that re-planning may provide value in particular cases [7,8,9,10]. That is, adaptive planning is capable of improving plan quality, but is not strictly required to adhere to the ABS normal tissue guidelines or the EMBRACE II limits for prescribed dose.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results suggest that for any three-fraction prescription regimen, a Day 2 verification image adds value to assessing inter-fraction changes. The results of this study also reinforce the findings of previous adaptive planning studies indicating that re-planning may provide value in particular cases [7,8,9,10]. That is, adaptive planning is capable of improving plan quality, but is not strictly required to adhere to the ABS normal tissue guidelines or the EMBRACE II limits for prescribed dose.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Previous gynecologic brachytherapy studies have investigated the dosimetric impact of inter-fraction changes [5,6] and the added value of adaptive planning [7,8,9,10]. Most of these studies have assessed the value of adaptive planning for treatment regimens where the prescription dose is delivered over five or six fractions [7,8,9]. These studies showed mixed results on the benefit of adaptive planning but demonstrate improvement in selected cases with large anatomical changes.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…BT utilizes various devices to position strongly ionizing radioactive seeds in the immediate vicinity of the primary tumour, which allows for the considerable sparing of OARs [224]. Anchorage of these devices to the patient also greatly reduces concerns of organ displacement which is a major concern for EBRT [225][226][227]. The radiation of BT seeds possesses an intrinsic sharp dose falloff and so optimization of seeds' dwell positions and times leads to highly conformal dose distributions in treatment plans [228].…”
Section: Brachytherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a scarcity of definitive comparative studies in the literature involving the use of real-time guidance for the catheter placement in P-ISBT. The lack of adequate and accessible real-time guidance for catheter placement is a significant issue that contributes to the difficulty associated with the P-ISBT technique for gynecological cancers [28,87,90]. In addition to minimizing the difficulty associated with the technically challenging nature of P-ISBT, real-time guidance during the implant procedure has demonstrated improvements in implant geometry [87].…”
Section: Research Problem 161 Definition Of Research Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of adequate and accessible real-time guidance for catheter placement is a significant issue that contributes to the difficulty associated with the P-ISBT technique for gynecological cancers [28,87,90]. In addition to minimizing the difficulty associated with the technically challenging nature of P-ISBT, real-time guidance during the implant procedure has demonstrated improvements in implant geometry [87]. Optimal implant geometry is associated with uniform dose across the target volume and minimized dose to OARs while poor quality implants are linked to less desirable patient outcomes [34,91].…”
Section: Research Problem 161 Definition Of Research Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%