2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of interferers in sampling materials used in explosive residue analysis by ion chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another relevant factor that can contribute to inconclusive results is the usual absence of control or blank samples sent to the laboratory alongside the questioned materials. The presence of environmental ions, especially in cases involving inorganic based explosives (explosive mixtures based on chlorates and/or perchlorates; explosive emulsion and black gunpowder), which, as shown, represent the vast majority of the cases studied (88%), might make result interpretation a complex dilemma, especially in cases of low concentrations of analytes, since residues of inorganic explosives, in general, consist of ions that can be naturally present in the environment [14] or in routinely used materials [22]. In general, environmental control samples should be collected from apparently uncontaminated areas adjacent to the explosion site, such as building products and chemical fire extinguishers [14], in addition to sampling and pre‐processing materials (swabs, cotton balls/rolls/discs and syringe) [22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another relevant factor that can contribute to inconclusive results is the usual absence of control or blank samples sent to the laboratory alongside the questioned materials. The presence of environmental ions, especially in cases involving inorganic based explosives (explosive mixtures based on chlorates and/or perchlorates; explosive emulsion and black gunpowder), which, as shown, represent the vast majority of the cases studied (88%), might make result interpretation a complex dilemma, especially in cases of low concentrations of analytes, since residues of inorganic explosives, in general, consist of ions that can be naturally present in the environment [14] or in routinely used materials [22]. In general, environmental control samples should be collected from apparently uncontaminated areas adjacent to the explosion site, such as building products and chemical fire extinguishers [14], in addition to sampling and pre‐processing materials (swabs, cotton balls/rolls/discs and syringe) [22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that only a small part of the crimes related to ATMs/cash safes theft with the use of explosives in Brazil are subjected to chemical analysis for explosive identification, representing approximately 1.5% of the total number of cases. in general, consist of ions that can be naturally present in the environment [14] or in routinely used materials [22]. In general, environmental control samples should be collected from apparently uncontaminated areas adjacent to the explosion site, such as building products and chemical fire extinguishers [14], in addition to sampling and pre-processing materials (swabs, cotton balls/rolls/discs and syringe) [22].…”
Section: To Determine An Accurate Number Of Explosion Attacks Againstmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They further analyzed commercially available cotton swabs, cotton balls, and cotton discs and found these to have similar interferents albeit on a, surprisingly, lower level than the forensic ones. Finally, they report that all sampling materials can be cleaned of these ions through three washes [ 71 ]. The nature of post-blast analysis of inorganic explosives is such that these types of ions are often all that remains to be detected.…”
Section: Sampling and Concentration Of Explosive Tracesmentioning
confidence: 99%