Evaluation of Industrial Urea Energy Consumption (EC) Based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

Abstract

With the increasingly prominent environmental problems and the decline of fossil fuel reserves, the reduction of energy consumption (EC) has become a common goal in the world. Urea industry is a typical energy-intensive chemical industry. However, studies just focus on the breakthrough of specific production technology or only consider the EC in the production stage. This results in a lack of evaluations of the life cycle of energy consumption (LcEC). In order to provide a systematic, scientific, and practical theoretical basis for the industrial upgrading and the energy transformation, LcEC of urea production and the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated in the process of EC are studied in this paper. The results show that the average LcEC is about 30.1 GJ/t urea. The EC of the materials preparation stage, synthesis stage, and waste-treatment stage (ECRMP, ECPP, ECWD) is about 0.388 GJ/t urea, 24.8 GJ/t urea, and 4.92 GJ/t urea, accounting for 1.3%, 82.4%, and 16.3% of LcEC, respectively. Thus, the synthesis stage is a dominant energy-consumer, in which 15.4 GJ/t urea of energy, accounting for 62.0% of ECpp, supports steam consumption. According to the energy distribution analysis, it can be concluded that coal presents the primary energy in the process of urea production, which supports 94.4% of LcEC. The proportion of coal consumption is significantly higher than that of the average of 59% in China. Besides, the GHG emissions in the synthesis stage are obviously larger than that in the other stage, with an average of 2.18 t eq.CO2/t urea, accounting for 81.3% of the life cycle of GHG (LcGHG) emissions. In detail, CO2 is the dominant factor accounting for 90.0% of LcGHG emissions, followed by CH4, while N2O is negligible. Coal is the primary source of CO2 emissions. The severe high proportion of coal consumption in the life cycle of urea production is responsible for this high CO2 content of GHG emissions. Therefore, for industrial urea upgrading and energy transformation, reducing coal consumption will still be an important task for energy structure transformation. At the same time, the reformation of synthesis technologies, especially for steam energy-consuming technology, will mainly reduce the EC of the urea industry. Furthermore, the application of green energy will be conducive to a win-win situation for both economic and environmental benefits.

Life cycle assessment of biocemented sands using enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) for soil stabilization applications

“…These results are in agreement with Raymond et al 43 , in which process emissions were found to be the highest contributor, followed by onsite EICP emissions. In addition, in the urea production process generation of ammonia gas (gasification) consumes 60–70% of the total supplied energy 59 , 60 . Another key GWP contributor was the non-fat milk powder used as an additive to improve the EICP cementation efficiency, with ~ 15% of the total GWP of the EICP process.…”

Life Cycle Assessment of Biocemented Sands using Enzyme Induced Carbonate Precipitation (EICP) for Ground Improvement Applications

“…These results are in agreement with Raymond et al (2021), in which process emissions were found to be the highest contributor, followed by onsite EICP emissions. In addition, in the urea production process generation of ammonia gas (gasi cation) consumes 60 to 70% of the total supplied energy (Shi et al 2020;Zhou et al 2010). Another key GWP contributor was the non-fat milk powder used as an additive to improve the EICP cementation e ciency, with ~ 15% of the total GWP of the EICP process.…”

Bioprecipitation of calcium carbonate mediated by ureolysis: A review

“…Urea is commonly used as a constituent of the cementation solution and growth media for the biocementation process and bacterial cell propagation, unfortunately, has a large greenhouse footprint. Most of the CO 2 used to manufacture urea comes from CO 2 generated during the production of ammonia, and is thus responsible for the high CO 2 content of greenhouse gas emissions [109]. The global carbon footprint of technical-grade urea fertiliser ranges between 1.484 to 3.002 CO 2 eq/kg product (including CO 2 captured in the product) [110].…”