2012
DOI: 10.14227/dt190412p30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of In Vitro Equivalence for Tablets Containing the Poorly WaterSoluble Compound Atorvastatin

Abstract: This paper describes the evaluation of the in vitro equivalence of tablets containing a poorly water-soluble compound, atorvastatin, marketed in Bangladesh under biowaiver conditions. Drug release was compared with that of a reference product. The in vitro equivalence test was carried out in three different media (pH 1.2, pH 4.5, and pH 6.8). Test results were subjected to statistical analysis to compare the dissolution profiles. Model-independent approaches of difference factor (f 1 ), similarity factor (f 2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculation of DE employs area under dissolution curve over a time period. The test products are considered to be similar when their DE values are close to that of reference product (within ± 10% is often acceptable) (26). DE values of all generic products selected in this study ranged from 74.2% to 88.0%, which were within ± 10% range of the innovator product (81.4%), as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Dissolution Profilementioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Calculation of DE employs area under dissolution curve over a time period. The test products are considered to be similar when their DE values are close to that of reference product (within ± 10% is often acceptable) (26). DE values of all generic products selected in this study ranged from 74.2% to 88.0%, which were within ± 10% range of the innovator product (81.4%), as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Dissolution Profilementioning
confidence: 78%
“…The values of f 1 and f 2 were used to analyze the dissolution profiles of the test products. A generic product with a value of f 1 between 0-15 and f 2 in the range of 50-100 is considered to have a similar drug release profile as the innovator product (25,26).…”
Section: Dissolution Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…respectively. If f 1 is found in between 0-15 and f 2 in between 50-100, the dissolution profile of test generic brand is considered as bioequivalent with the innovator brand [9,10].…”
Section: Dissolution Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solubility is pH-dependent i.e at pH 1.2 is 0.02mg/mL while increases to 1.23mg/mL at pH 6.8 (Kearney et al, 1993). The dose/solubility ratio for atorvastatin calcium is more than 250mL for the 10mg dose at pH 1.2 and dissolves in 250mL at pH 6.8 (Popy et al, 2012). The low oral bioavailability of atorvastatin calcium (12-14%) is caused by low aqueous solubility in the gastric and high first-pass metabolism in the liver (Sonje et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low oral bioavailability of atorvastatin calcium (12-14%) is caused by low aqueous solubility in the gastric and high first-pass metabolism in the liver (Sonje et al, 2010). The dissolution profiles of atorvastatin calcium tablets which are currently marketed with generic and branded generic names vary per product and affect their bioavailability profiles (Oishi et al, 2011;Popy et al, 2012). Several techniques have been developed to increase the dissolution of atorvastatin calcium, including crystal modification (Gozali et al, 2014; ), co-grinding (Prabhu and Patravale, 2015), solid dispersion (Gozali et al, 2015;Rodde et al, 2014;Panghal et al, 2014;Khan and Dehghan, 2011), lipid-based formulations such as micro and nanoemulsions (Chouksey et al, 2011;Snela et al, 2019;Kadu et al, 2011), and liquisolid technique (Gubbi and Jarag, 2010;Baskaran et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%