2017
DOI: 10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i10.20456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of in Vitro Cytotoxic Effect of Violacein Produced by Novel Isolate Chromobacterium Vaccinii Cv5 Against the Cervical and Lung Cancer Cell

Abstract: Objectives: This study investigates the in vitro anticancer activity of the violacein extracted from the Chromobacterium vaccinii CV5.Methods: Natural colorants or dyes derived from flora to fauna are believed to be safe because of nontoxic, noncarcinogenic, and biodegradable in nature. There are a number of natural pigments, but only a few are available in sufficient quantities for industrial production. The cytotoxicity activity of pigment was assessed against the cervical (HeLa) and lung cancer (A549) cell … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The divergences in its IC50 value from other studies suggested the presence of various cell-typespecific mechanisms that operate in the existence of violacein. (Alshatwi et al, 2016, Santhosh andMuthusamy, 2017). The violacein antiproliferative effect achieved by reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in cancer, causing apoptosis promoting via enhances of intracellular calcium and release of cytochrome c (De Carvalho et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The divergences in its IC50 value from other studies suggested the presence of various cell-typespecific mechanisms that operate in the existence of violacein. (Alshatwi et al, 2016, Santhosh andMuthusamy, 2017). The violacein antiproliferative effect achieved by reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in cancer, causing apoptosis promoting via enhances of intracellular calcium and release of cytochrome c (De Carvalho et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%