2020
DOI: 10.1080/23744731.2020.1776549
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of in-duct UV-C lamp array on air disinfection: A numerical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, CFD simulation shows that the average UV dose should be 10.97 J/m 2 , a more accurate dose value that gives closer disinfection efficacy for MS2 with the experimental results [ 78 ]. In the same manner, the average UV dose for EPA 600/R-06/051 ( Table 2 ) was corrected from 2.95 to 18 [ 10 ], 18.3 [ 79 ] and 18.45 J/m 2 [ 78 ] using CFD simulations. The UV dose differences in the three simulation results are attributed to the particle trajectories within the system, the 25% or 15% diffusive wall reflectivity used, and the different particle characteristics.…”
Section: In-duct Uvgi System Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, CFD simulation shows that the average UV dose should be 10.97 J/m 2 , a more accurate dose value that gives closer disinfection efficacy for MS2 with the experimental results [ 78 ]. In the same manner, the average UV dose for EPA 600/R-06/051 ( Table 2 ) was corrected from 2.95 to 18 [ 10 ], 18.3 [ 79 ] and 18.45 J/m 2 [ 78 ] using CFD simulations. The UV dose differences in the three simulation results are attributed to the particle trajectories within the system, the 25% or 15% diffusive wall reflectivity used, and the different particle characteristics.…”
Section: In-duct Uvgi System Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to estimating the average UV dose of a UVGI system, the CFD simulation with the DPM can reveal the cumulative UV dose distribution with respect to particle counts and the standard deviation of the system average UV dose, which is particularly important from the perspective of inactivating an individual microorganism. For instance, a study shows that an arrangement of four vertical lamps has an average UV dose and standard deviation of 18.3 and 4.17 J/m 2 [ 79 ]. In reality, the overdosed UV irradiance on one particle will not transfer to and average with other underexposed particles, resulting in the wasted energy input for the overdosed bioaerosols and insufficient characterization of a system with the average UV dose.…”
Section: In-duct Uvgi System Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the physical technologies, non-ionising UV-C irradiation is increasingly used, alone or in combination with other cleaning and disinfection methods, in a wide range of applications including food industry and food safety [7,8], agriculture [9], water decontamination [10,11], indoor air and surfaces [12,13,14], healthcare environments [15,16,17,18,19], and personal protective equipment [20], the latter application being particularly assessed in the context of the COVID-19 pandemics and subsequent critical shortage of supply chain [21,22]. Germicidal ultraviolet irradiation (GUVI) encompasses a continuous range of UV wavelengths between 200 to 280 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%