2007
DOI: 10.2174/138920007780866799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Human Pharmacokinetics, Therapeutic Dose and Exposure Predictions Using Marketed Oral Drugs

Abstract: In this article approaches to predict human pharmacokinetics (PK) are discussed and the capability of the exemplified methodologies to estimate individual PK parameters and therapeutic dose for a set of marketed oral drugs has been assessed. For a set of 63 drugs where the minimum efficacious concentration (MEC) and human PK were known, the clinical dose was shown to be well predicted or in some cases over-estimated using a simple one-compartment oral PK model. For a subset of these drugs, in vitro potency aga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
127
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For VD ss , a large proportion of the values (approximately 42%) falls within total body water (0.7 l/kg). Only a small subset of these drugs was confined to blood (or plasma) volume, with a value close to the generally accepted distribution volume of albumin, or 0.1 l/kg (McGinnity et al, 2007 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For VD ss , a large proportion of the values (approximately 42%) falls within total body water (0.7 l/kg). Only a small subset of these drugs was confined to blood (or plasma) volume, with a value close to the generally accepted distribution volume of albumin, or 0.1 l/kg (McGinnity et al, 2007 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Previous reports have focused on prediction methods that utilize animal pharmacokinetic data (Caldwell et al, 2004;Ward and Smith, 2004a,b;Jolivette and Ward, 2005;Evans et al, 2006;Mahmood et al, 2006;Martinez et al, 2006;Tang and Mayersohn, 2006;Fagerholm, 2007;McGinnity et al, 2007) and in vitro data (Obach et al, 1997;Lombardo et al, 2002Lombardo et al, , 2004Nestorov et al, 2002;Riley et al, 2005;Grime and Riley, 2006). Recently, the availability of computational chemistry methodologies has increased, and these have been applied to the prediction of human pharmacokinetics and/or general absorption-distribution-metabolism-excretion-toxicology properties (Cruciani et al, 2005;Ghafourian et al, 2006;Gleeson et al, 2006;Lombardo et al, 2006;Gleeson, 2007;Gunturi and Narayanan, 2007;Norinder and Bergstroem, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics departments have spent considerable effort in developing suitable strategies to mitigate drug failure attributed to suboptimal human pharmacokinetics (McGinnity et al, 2007;Beaumont and Smith, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, their analysis of 103 compounds did not consider potential species differences in plasma protein binding. Other studies have examined single-or multiple-species scaling based on the assumption of V ss,u or f ut equivalency across species using proprietary compounds, with limited species, or only having oral half-life data available in humans for comparison (Obach et al, 1997;McGinnity et al, 2007;Hosea et al, 2009). In such studies, scaling V ss from rats or dogs is proposed to be more accurate (Hosea et al, 2009;Sui et al, 2010), depending on the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%