2015
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Hallux Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty Compared With Nonoperative Treatment of Recalcitrant Hallux Ulceration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other clinicians have good results with their procedures (e.g. hallux interphalangeal arthroplasty for ulcers under the interphalangeal joint [ 31 ]). The innovation in this protocol is the semi-crossover design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other clinicians have good results with their procedures (e.g. hallux interphalangeal arthroplasty for ulcers under the interphalangeal joint [ 31 ]). The innovation in this protocol is the semi-crossover design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our team at Assaf HaRofeh has recently published successful results for several offloading surgical procedures [ 15 , 18 , 29 , 30 ] as have other clinicians with other procedures [ 31 ]. Our standard management included clinical assessment of the foot deformity before and after surgery to see how well the deformity had been corrected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, others have considered open ulcerations to be a contraindication for HIPJ fusion (5). Others have suggested Keller arthroplasty (18) or HIPJ arthroplasty (19) for hallux interphalangeal joint ulcerations. Given the high complications with HIPJ arthrodesis in the presence of PN, arthroplasty might be a reasonable alternative for these patients because it does not demand fusion of bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A validation set of 30 publications was created, including key studies known to the authors published since our previous search (July 29, 2014) . Using this set, the search strings used were validated; ie, each publication had to be identified before the search strings were used in this systematic review.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%