2016
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Hallux Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Fixation Techniques: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nonunion rates are higher than the 10% nonunion rate reported by Shives and Johnson 5 in their cohort of 20 patients receiving retrograde screw fixation for their HIPJA. However, when compared to a study of similar magnitude like Thorud et al’s 8 multicenter study with nonunion rates of 23.1%, 23%, and 28% for, respectively, crossed screw, single screw, and “other” configurations we find that they are similar to ours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The nonunion rates are higher than the 10% nonunion rate reported by Shives and Johnson 5 in their cohort of 20 patients receiving retrograde screw fixation for their HIPJA. However, when compared to a study of similar magnitude like Thorud et al’s 8 multicenter study with nonunion rates of 23.1%, 23%, and 28% for, respectively, crossed screw, single screw, and “other” configurations we find that they are similar to ours.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A total of 48 patients required reoperations (“additional procedures”) in our series (21.1%), which again was similar to the rate of reoperation published in a series of 152 patients published by Thorud et al in 2016 (23%). 8 Patients with radiographic nonunion were at higher risk for all-cause reoperation (39.7%) than patients with radiographic union (14.8%) in our series (Table 2, P < .0001, odds ratio 3.785). Many patients required reoperation despite successful arthrodesis for a mix of symptomatic hardware and wound healing or infection related complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, reported infection and dehiscence rates have ranged from 0% to 15%; and nonunion rates have been reported to range from 0% to 44%. 10,11 A recent retrospective multicenter study by Thorud et al 12 showed clinical and radiographic nonunion rate of greater than or equal to 17.8% and greater than or equal to 13.8% for HIPJ fusion respectively, contributing to a 27% reoperation rate. Such reoperation rate is well within the reported high range of 16% to 40% from previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%