2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of gaseous and solid waste in fermentation bedding system and its impact on animal performance: A study of breeder ducks in winter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in a study using 12,921 breeding ducks, their contact with air pollutants, including fine particulate matter (PM2.5), coarse particulate matter (PM10), and total suspended particulate matter (TSP), was reduced, finding that the reduction of PM2.5 was one of the important environmental parameters that affected the productive and reproductive performance of birds (Han et al, 2022).…”
Section: Passer Domesticusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in a study using 12,921 breeding ducks, their contact with air pollutants, including fine particulate matter (PM2.5), coarse particulate matter (PM10), and total suspended particulate matter (TSP), was reduced, finding that the reduction of PM2.5 was one of the important environmental parameters that affected the productive and reproductive performance of birds (Han et al, 2022).…”
Section: Passer Domesticusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No scientific evidence is available for the optimum litter depth for Domestic, Muscovy and Mule ducks, but a depth of 10 cm or much less is used in commercial production. Other litter management interventions are the frequency of new litter supply, litter turning, removal of soiled or moist litter, adjustment of ventilation and water source (Raud and Faure, 1994 ; Jones and Dawkins, 2010a ) and litter treatment with acidifiers (Shepherd et al., 2017 ; de Toledo et al., 2020 ) or with fermenting microorganisms (Han et al., 2022 ). Acidifiers reduce the pH, the moisture and ammonia content of the litter (de Toledo et al., 2020 ), while fermenting microorganisms increase the temperature in the house and reduce the emission of ammonia, carbon‐dioxide, hydrogen‐sulphide and dust particles (Han et al., 2022 ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fermentation bed system (FBS) is an animal housing system of environmental protection, a safe and effective ecological pig raising mode combined with the modern microbial fermentation technology [ 38 ]. These systems mainly focus on reducing animal waste pollution, decreasing incidence, protecting animal welfare, improving animal product quality, and increasing breeding benefits, and can be used for recycling and sustainable production [ 39 ], as they are cheaper to establish compared to conventional confinement systems. This technology is based on the repeated spreading of sawdust, rice husk, corn stalks, or other agricultural material in indoor booths.…”
Section: The Eco-agricultural Industrial Chain Of “Crop Farming Breed...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, other related studies showed that it was conducive to improving the sensory and edible quality for animal raising with FBS; meanwhile, FBS shows advantages in the reduction of NH 3 , CH 4 , N 2 O, and CO 2 [ 44 , 45 ]. Different bedding materials could affect the fermentation process of animal manure in FBS, which would affect animals’ feeding environments, health, and production performance [ 39 ]. For example, corn stover has the greatest reduction in NH 3 and wood chips reduce the emissions of CH 4 , N 2 O, and CO 2 from animal feces [ 45 ].…”
Section: The Eco-agricultural Industrial Chain Of “Crop Farming Breed...mentioning
confidence: 99%