2019
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2019.1693076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of gap-filling methods for Landsat 7 ETM+ SLC-off image for LULC classification in a heterogeneous landscape of West Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The later Landsat-8 mission collected over 3. 35 Petabyte of scenes over the course of a single year in 2017 [12]. These data collections hold great potential to improve our monitoring efforts of mangrove ecosystems and study changes over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The later Landsat-8 mission collected over 3. 35 Petabyte of scenes over the course of a single year in 2017 [12]. These data collections hold great potential to improve our monitoring efforts of mangrove ecosystems and study changes over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in discrete land cover classification exercises, this practice remains less common, including in combination with the GEE platform [33,34]. Current studies tend to focus on gap-filling based on spatially neighboring pixels [35,36], spectral similarity, and/or multi-sensor (source) data fusion [34,37,38], rather than temporal integration. As such, few land use studies have taken full advantage of temporal dependencies to reduce both information gaps and inconsistent land use transitions [13,[39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the ability to supplement satellite data by means of other datasets is also of paramount importance. One way to fill the gaps left by cloud coverage is to complement satellite data using other sensors [51]. Therefore, conversion functions need to be developed to convert spectral data from Landsat 8, Sentinel 2, and other sensors to mitigate inconsistencies in surface reflectance and vegetation indices due to spatial resolution and spectra configuration [52].…”
Section: Methods For Improving the Usability The Sentinel 2 And Landsat 8 Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the most commonly used method of classification accuracy evaluation is the confusion matrix method, which is an error matrix, which is expressed by the number of correct classifications and the number of misclassifications in the experimental samples. In the confusion matrix, the overall classification accuracy (OA) and Kappa coefficient are mainly used to verify the classification results and evaluate the accuracy [23,29].…”
Section: Study Area and Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%