2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4661-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of functionality for serine and threonine phosphorylation with different evolutionary ages in human and mouse

Abstract: BackgroundRapid evolution of phosphorylation sites could provide raw materials of natural selection to fit the environment by rewiring the regulation of signal pathways. However, a large part of phosphorylation sites was suggested to be non-functional. Although the new-arising phosphorylation sites with little functional implications prevailed in fungi, the evolutionary performance of vertebrate phosphorylation sites remained elusive.ResultsIn this study, we evaluated the functionality of human and mouse phosp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result seems to contradict to the notion that the cellular function of phosphosites in an island depends on the number of phosphorylated residues rather than specific phosphorylated sites, whereas individual phosphosites operate as single-site switches and hence should be more conserved (Landry et al 2014). However, this argument implies that phosphorylation of most individual phosphosites is important for the organism's fitness, which may be not true (Landry et al 2014;Miao et al 2018) and hence our results do not contradict the model of evolution of functionally important phosphosites.…”
Section: Clustered Vs Individual Phosphositescontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our result seems to contradict to the notion that the cellular function of phosphosites in an island depends on the number of phosphorylated residues rather than specific phosphorylated sites, whereas individual phosphosites operate as single-site switches and hence should be more conserved (Landry et al 2014). However, this argument implies that phosphorylation of most individual phosphosites is important for the organism's fitness, which may be not true (Landry et al 2014;Miao et al 2018) and hence our results do not contradict the model of evolution of functionally important phosphosites.…”
Section: Clustered Vs Individual Phosphositescontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…3a). In earlier studies, only mutations of serines or to serines had been considered, as the available data did not allow for statistically significant results for threonine and tyrosine (Kurmangaliyev et al 2011;Miao et al 2018). Here, we see that phosphorylated threonines from the HMR dataset tend to mutate to serines (Fig.…”
Section: Mutational Patterns Of Phosphorylated Amino Acidsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is similar to the reported incidence of non-functional phosphorylation sites in mammalian and fungal proteomes and the loose substrate specificity of many protein kinases. In these studies evolutionarily conserved phosphorylation sites were more likely to be functional compared to poorly conserved sites 30 . These data all suggest that many post-translational modifications within the proteome may not actually have a function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The phosphorylation of serine and threonine is more likely to be non-functional in disordered areas. In a study of 2018, based on large-scale data of human and mouse phosphorylation sites, it was found that the sites in the senior group were more likely to function and participate in the signaling pathways than those in the young group, and serine phosphorylation may be related to the occurrence of neurodegenerative diseases [78]. Mutations of some specific genes lead to neurodegeneration through the loss of protein function [79][80][81], PTM can regulate the structure and function of proteins, and also regulate toxicity among several pathogenic proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%