2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.05.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of focus measures for the autofocus of line scan cameras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Columns one to four in the figure are the three models of the 3D morphologies that were recovered and generated by using 3 × 3, 5 × 5, and 7 × 7 windows and the adaptive evaluation window proposed in Salt-and-pepper noise with a density of 0.01 was added to the images of the 10th, 20th, 30th, 40th, 50th, 60th, 70th, 80th, 90th, and 100th frames of the spherical, complex, and simple surface models. The three focus measures F SML , F TEN [38], and F GLV [39] were selected as the test measures. Windows with a size of 3 × 3, 5 × 5, 7 × 7, and the adaptive evaluation window proposed in this paper were used to conduct a 3D morphological recovery test for the image sequences generated using the three models.…”
Section: Test Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Columns one to four in the figure are the three models of the 3D morphologies that were recovered and generated by using 3 × 3, 5 × 5, and 7 × 7 windows and the adaptive evaluation window proposed in Salt-and-pepper noise with a density of 0.01 was added to the images of the 10th, 20th, 30th, 40th, 50th, 60th, 70th, 80th, 90th, and 100th frames of the spherical, complex, and simple surface models. The three focus measures F SML , F TEN [38], and F GLV [39] were selected as the test measures. Windows with a size of 3 × 3, 5 × 5, 7 × 7, and the adaptive evaluation window proposed in this paper were used to conduct a 3D morphological recovery test for the image sequences generated using the three models.…”
Section: Test Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tenengrad operator [11,12] is a kind of discrete first-order difference operator, which is often used to evaluate the sharpness of an image. The Focus Measure (FM) of each pixel in each multi-focused image can be calculated as Equation (1):…”
Section: Methods 21 3d Information Extraction From Multi-focused Imag...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the image sharpness evaluation, Xia et al [ 4 ] have summarized and compared 16 traditional functions, including Laplace, Tenengrad, spatial frequency, wavelet transform, and fast Fourier transform, finding that Tenengrad performs best in the focus measure both for global search and local search, but has a weak noise immunity performance. In addition, Xia [ 5 ] proposed a new fusion algorithm by dividing information entropy and Tenengrad to enhance noise resistance, but it takes a bit longer timewise.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%