2012
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0000512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Flow-Altering Countermeasures against Bridge Pier Scour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of Tafarojnoruz [26] also show that some kinds of pier scour countermeasures, e.g., pier slot, may not significantly change the similarity of the scour shape.…”
Section: The Profile Morphology Of the Scour Holesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Results of Tafarojnoruz [26] also show that some kinds of pier scour countermeasures, e.g., pier slot, may not significantly change the similarity of the scour shape.…”
Section: The Profile Morphology Of the Scour Holesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The Buckingham theorem applied to Eq. (1), with ρ, U , and b as basic variables, leads to the following dimensionless relationship (Tafarojnoruz et al 2012):…”
Section: Dimensional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of a countermeasure, the maximum scour depth occurs at the pier front (e.g. Grimaldi et al 2009b, Tafarojnoruz et al 2012. Therefore, the efficiency of the countermeasure r de is defined in terms of the reduction of the equilibrium maximum scour depth observed in proximity to the pier as…”
Section: Efficiency Of Countermeasuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[32] tested slots of different heights from the initial bed level to the water surface and found that over 60% of the scour depth would be mitigated with a height of 0.33D to 0.77D. Recently, Tafarojnoruz et al [33] evaluated six types of flow-altering countermeasures (submerged vanes, bed sill, transverse sacrificial piles, collar, threading and pier slot) under steady currents with the velocity slightly lower than that of the threshold condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%