2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.11.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of finite volume solutions for radiative heat transfer in a closed cavity solar receiver for high temperature solar thermal processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies employing the MC method include (Ebner and Lipiń ski, 2011;Jäger et al, 2009;Lapp et al, 2013;Lipiń ski et al, 2006;Martinek and Weimer, 2013a;Zedtwitz et al, 2007;Zedtwitz and Steinfeld, 2005;Z'Graggen and Steinfeld, 2009;. The finite volume method has been analysed for its applicability in STRS simulation in (Martinek and Weimer, 2013b). It was found that a hybrid MC/FV approach, that took the accuracy of the MC method with the easy compatibility of the FV with CFD solvers, was an ''optimal" approach.…”
Section: Radiative Energy Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies employing the MC method include (Ebner and Lipiń ski, 2011;Jäger et al, 2009;Lapp et al, 2013;Lipiń ski et al, 2006;Martinek and Weimer, 2013a;Zedtwitz et al, 2007;Zedtwitz and Steinfeld, 2005;Z'Graggen and Steinfeld, 2009;. The finite volume method has been analysed for its applicability in STRS simulation in (Martinek and Weimer, 2013b). It was found that a hybrid MC/FV approach, that took the accuracy of the MC method with the easy compatibility of the FV with CFD solvers, was an ''optimal" approach.…”
Section: Radiative Energy Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the DO method has two major shortcomings due to its FV nature, namely the "ray effect" and "false scattering", which affect result accuracy (Brunner, 2002;Chai and Patankar, 2006). The former is also known as "ray concentration" (Martinek and Weimer, 2013), and the latter as "numerical scattering" (Li, 2004), "numerical smearing" (Jessee and Fiveland, 1997) or "false diffusion" in CFD communities (Hachicha, 2013). Before using DO as a ray-tracing method in a solar field, the ability of reducing these shortcoming effects must be checked.…”
Section: Overcoming Do Shortcomings In Ray Tracingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 2 above, Hachicha (2013) and later in Figure 11 for a much more complicated 2-D geometry, when a planar 2-D domain is considered, only three angular increments are required for the second ordinate direction. This means that the 25*25 increments used by Martinek and Weimer (2013) were unnecessary and resulted in a computational cost of 4*25*25 versus 4*3*25, an increase by a factor of more than 8. However, the studies of both Hachicha (2013) and Martinek and Weimer (2013) are good examples of the applicability of the DO solution using FV for solar applications.…”
Section: Test Case For Oblique Collimated Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A major part of the research into the use of concentrated solar radiation at very high temperatures has been motivated by the desire to generate high energy density thermochemical energy storage systems, see e.g. Diver et al (1992), Kodama (2003), Wieckert et al (2007), Neises et al (2012), Martinek & Weimer (2013), Tescari et al 2013), and the solar upgrading of carbonaceous materials (Zgraggen et al 2007), (Rodat et al 2010) and (Piatkowski et al 2011). These reaction schemes usually involve solar heating of combinations of gaseous and solid reactants to generate gaseous and solid products such as the two step water and CO2 splitting reactions involving intermediate metal oxides to generate hydrogen and/or synthesis gas (Steinfeld 2005), (Meier et al 2012), (Villasmil et al 2014) and (Neises et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%