2018
DOI: 10.21276/apalm.1527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Cervical Lymphadenopathies at Tertiary Care Center

Abstract: Background: Lymphadenopathies in the neck region is the most frequently sent for the cytology evaluation from the clinicians, involvement in regional and systemic diseases and their easy accessibility make the FNAC as a primary workup. Inflammatory and immune reactions are the most frequent causes of lymph node enlargement and are self limiting in majority of cases. Tuberculosis can also be diagnosed by cytology of affected lymph nodes. With the advent of FNAC, most of the inflammatory, reactive and neoplastic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On cytological evaluation of lymphadenopathy cases it was observed that non neoplastic cases (80%) were more common than the neoplastic malignant cases (20%) with ratio of non-neoplastic: neoplastic lesions as 4:1, which is in concordonce with most other studies. [12][13][14] ( Table 1). The study done by K R Anila et al [15] found neoplastic cases more than the non neoplastic cases which may be because the study has been done in a cancer institute.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On cytological evaluation of lymphadenopathy cases it was observed that non neoplastic cases (80%) were more common than the neoplastic malignant cases (20%) with ratio of non-neoplastic: neoplastic lesions as 4:1, which is in concordonce with most other studies. [12][13][14] ( Table 1). The study done by K R Anila et al [15] found neoplastic cases more than the non neoplastic cases which may be because the study has been done in a cancer institute.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gorle VK et al [12] 2018 82% 18% 4.55:1 2 Paikrao YM et al [13] 2018 80.11% 19.88% 4.02:1 3 Gojiya et al [14] 2018 76.7% 23.3% 3.29:1 4 K R Anila et al [15]…”
Section: S No Study Non-neoplastic Lesions Neoplastic Lesions Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar patterns are shown in other studies. 12,14,16 The major limitation of our study was selection bias owing to it being based in a tertiary care hospital. Also, clinical correlation and follow-up for the cases could not be done because of limited record keeping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%