2017
DOI: 10.1177/1526924817731880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Filgrastim Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Abstract: The use of filgrastim in kidney transplant recipients demonstrated success in reversing neutropenia. Short courses of therapy were required with minimal adverse events. Patients who required readmission were successfully re-treated. Additional studies are required to determine the most effective dose and duration of treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although G-CSF dosing in our study was variable, the average G-CSF dose administered was similar to the dose recommended in the oncology population (5 mcg/kg/day) 22 and administered in other trials of kidney transplant patients with leukopenia. 6,9,15,16 Following administration of mean 2.1 ± 1.9 doses of G-CSF, we observed WBC count recovery in median 9 (IQR 4-14) days, which is longer than previously reported in the literature. 5,6,15,16 Rather than a lack of efficacy in our cohort, this discrepancy likely reflects the reduced laboratory monitoring frequency for our patients managed in the outpatient setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 41%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although G-CSF dosing in our study was variable, the average G-CSF dose administered was similar to the dose recommended in the oncology population (5 mcg/kg/day) 22 and administered in other trials of kidney transplant patients with leukopenia. 6,9,15,16 Following administration of mean 2.1 ± 1.9 doses of G-CSF, we observed WBC count recovery in median 9 (IQR 4-14) days, which is longer than previously reported in the literature. 5,6,15,16 Rather than a lack of efficacy in our cohort, this discrepancy likely reflects the reduced laboratory monitoring frequency for our patients managed in the outpatient setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…6,9,15,16 Following administration of mean 2.1 ± 1.9 doses of G-CSF, we observed WBC count recovery in median 9 (IQR 4-14) days, which is longer than previously reported in the literature. 5,6,15,16 Rather than a lack of efficacy in our cohort, this discrepancy likely reflects the reduced laboratory monitoring frequency for our patients managed in the outpatient setting. Furthermore, we defined study inclusion based on leukopenia (WBC < 3000 cells/μL), 1,3,6,16 but all patients with available ANC data were neutropenic (ANC < 1000 cells/μL) at the time of G-CSF initiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 41%
See 3 more Smart Citations