2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of exploration and risk assessment in pre-weaning mice using the novel cage test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, as noted by Bruce et al (2009), we did not observe significant reductions in birth weight in offspring who demonstrated a moderate (approximately 15%), yet significant reduction in H19 ICR methylation, but did observe postnatal growth deficiencies. Secondly, a growth restricted phenotype similar to SRS, was correlated with hypomethylation of the H19 ICR CTCF binding sites that was associated with reduced offspring growth in the period following weaning (Marques et al, 2008; Nicholson et al, 2009). Lastly, weight recovery was observed during the post-weaning period, similar to findings of Blissett et al (2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, as noted by Bruce et al (2009), we did not observe significant reductions in birth weight in offspring who demonstrated a moderate (approximately 15%), yet significant reduction in H19 ICR methylation, but did observe postnatal growth deficiencies. Secondly, a growth restricted phenotype similar to SRS, was correlated with hypomethylation of the H19 ICR CTCF binding sites that was associated with reduced offspring growth in the period following weaning (Marques et al, 2008; Nicholson et al, 2009). Lastly, weight recovery was observed during the post-weaning period, similar to findings of Blissett et al (2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this non-prejudiced multivariate design, several measures can be monitored, providing a behavioral profile in a single test situation, rather than focusing on any particular behavior (Meyerson et al, 2006). The MCSF test has an ethoexperimental and multivariate approach, and has been used for behavioral profiling in a number of studies (Alsio et al, 2009;Augustsson et al, 2005;Augustsson and Meyerson, 2004;Karlsson et al, 2009;Marques et al, 2008;Roman and Colombo, 2009;Roman et al, 2006Roman et al, , 2007. ''Ethoexperimental'' means that native forms of behavior, derived from the natural environment of the species studied, is taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this may present an advantage in exploration-based paradigms, by introducing a chance to predict adult exploratory phenotypes (e.g. Marques et al, 2008), in tests which require animals to focus on one environmental cue, this higher tendency to explore may impair learning and performance. Therefore, reducing the novelty of the test environment is crucial when testing rodents at young ages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%