2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of juvenile mice in a reach-to-grasp task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard rodent pellets and water were provided ad libitum except during test period (W5-postnatal day 26) when food restriction was introduced. We used a training box of the same dimensions and followed procedures as established by Marques and Olsson ( 2010 ). Briefly, food restriction schedule provided enough food to maintain approximately 85 % of body weight.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Standard rodent pellets and water were provided ad libitum except during test period (W5-postnatal day 26) when food restriction was introduced. We used a training box of the same dimensions and followed procedures as established by Marques and Olsson ( 2010 ). Briefly, food restriction schedule provided enough food to maintain approximately 85 % of body weight.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recorded all sessions with a conventional camcorder for further analysis. Performance was analyzed according to the quantitative measures established by Marques and Olsson ( 2010 ): Latency to the first reaching attempt (the single first time the mouse performed a reaching movement), reaching accuracy = (number of pellets retrieved/number of reaches) × 100, latency to retrieve one pellet (the latency of the first successful grasp on each testing day) and time of performance = latency to retrieve 5 pellets − latency to retrieve 1 pellet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined coordinated motor function of the reach-tograsp test that is more sensitive and clinically relevant (Marques and Olsson, 2010). In sham control and stroke animals, the suc-4 (Figure legend continued.) in responding to CTZ were sites 41 and 44, which were located in the same cortical column judged from the brain slice orientation in F. Several responding sites were 400 -600 m away from the stimulation site (*), implicating neurons in a different cortical column.…”
Section: Intranasally Delivered Ctz Stimulated Grafted Lmo3-ips-npcs mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There also are occasional evidences about a possibility of elaboration of the manipulatory foodprocuring skill in mice older than one month [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terms of elaboration of inborn motor reactions in developing rats have been studied sufficiently well [1,2]. However, there are only a few works that deal with detection of possibilities of learning of rat pups [3][4][5] and mouse pups [6] of behavior tasks at the early terms of postnatal development. At the same time, the data are absent in literature about terms and dynamics of development of the lateral preference in using the anterior paws in rats at the period of early postnatal ontogenesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%