2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of essential clinical components and features of current acne global grading scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Recently, 18 of these grading scales were ranked based on a variety of characteristics. 25 To date, there is no universally agreed-upon grading system, and systems can differ greatly between studies. In addition, interobserver reliability of these scales varies, but has been poor in some studies.…”
Section: Systems For the Grading And Classification Of Acnementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Recently, 18 of these grading scales were ranked based on a variety of characteristics. 25 To date, there is no universally agreed-upon grading system, and systems can differ greatly between studies. In addition, interobserver reliability of these scales varies, but has been poor in some studies.…”
Section: Systems For the Grading And Classification Of Acnementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recently the chief components and features of an ideal acne scale have been identified; essential clinical components include primary lesion evaluation, their quantity, extent and sites of involvement, and features including ease of use, clinimetric properties, categorization of severity and acceptance by users . While none of the current scales fulfils all desired criteria, there is a core group that may provide a foundation to develop a widely accepted, credible standard assessment scale …”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acne grading systems should take into account the type and severity of the acne, number of lesions, anatomic location and the extent of the acne, patient quality of life and other psychosocial metrics, and scarring ( Zaenglein et al, 2016 ). Tan et al (2013) evaluated 18 global acne grading scales with grading methods that ranged from text descriptions, grades for number and type of lesions, grades for severity, grades for comedonal versus inflammatory acne to the use of standardizing photographs.…”
Section: Clinical Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%