1956
DOI: 10.1364/josa.46.000200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Errors of Optical Origin Arising in the Size Analysis of a Dispersion by Light Transmission*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1959
1959
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results for the chloroform-ethanol system are shown in Figure 1. Light transmission is a well-developed technique for determining particle size in dispersions (Rose and Lloyd, 1946;Boll and Sliepcevich, 1956;Dobbins and Jizmagian, 1966), and it has often been adopted for measurement of interfacial area in liquid-liquid and gas-liquid dispersions (Calderbank, 1958;Lee and Ssali, 1971; Trice and Rodger, 1956). The theory for the attenuation of the light beam has been given by a number of workers (Rose and Lloyd, 1946;Calderbank, 1958…”
Section: (18) (19)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results for the chloroform-ethanol system are shown in Figure 1. Light transmission is a well-developed technique for determining particle size in dispersions (Rose and Lloyd, 1946;Boll and Sliepcevich, 1956;Dobbins and Jizmagian, 1966), and it has often been adopted for measurement of interfacial area in liquid-liquid and gas-liquid dispersions (Calderbank, 1958;Lee and Ssali, 1971; Trice and Rodger, 1956). The theory for the attenuation of the light beam has been given by a number of workers (Rose and Lloyd, 1946;Calderbank, 1958…”
Section: (18) (19)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…May, 1977 matt black paper tubes to reduce the scattered light reaching the detector to a low level. It is not possible to completely exclude scattered light from the detector (Boll and Sliepcevich, 1956;Lothian and Chappel, 1951), aiid it is generally considered sufficient to ensure that the half angle subtended by the detector at the dispersion is less than about 1.4 deg. In this work the half angle was 1.15 deg.…”
Section: Page 396mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This causes the light detector to receive an excess amount of light. However, by the same reasoning as that given for forward scattering, the error introduced by multiple scattering will be minimized if the light detector has a high angular resolution (Boll and Sliepcevich, 1956;Sheppard, 1958). Thus, with proper construction of the light detector, the effects of multiple scattering and forward scattering will not be significant, and the scattering cross section of the drops will equal the geometric cross section.…”
Section: A T H E M a T I C A L M O D E L Of Light T R A N S M I S Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x {la,I 2 + Ib,12}, [23] where a, and b, are complex functions of a and m. Except for small, a < 0.6, and large, a > 25.0, particles, Eq. [23] should be used to accurately calculate Q. Scattering coefficients for colloidal systems are tabulated quite extensively in the literature (13)(14)(15). For small and large particles, approximation formulas, which are accurate within at least 1% of the values calculated from Eq.…”
Section: Efo 3o4mentioning
confidence: 99%