2014
DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2014.11929141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Epidural Analgesia for Open Major Liver Resection Surgery from a us Inpatient Sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clarke et al (18) in a retrospective study suggested analgesic superiority when using epidurals for analgesia during LDLT surgery. However, there are inherent risks of neuraxial hematoma -despite the fact that liver donors have normal preoperative liver function (19) -due to unanticipated coagulation derangements from such surgery that could result in a catastrophic neuraxial hematoma making regional techniques controversial for these patients (20). In addition, certain non-narcotic analgesics (NSAIDs) used alone or in combination with neuraxial techniques can be impact modifiers of the coagulation system, and these carry risks that might result in adverse influences on coagulation and platelet-inhibition (increasing the risk of surgical bleeding) and should receive risk-to-benefit consideration in LDLT patients (21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clarke et al (18) in a retrospective study suggested analgesic superiority when using epidurals for analgesia during LDLT surgery. However, there are inherent risks of neuraxial hematoma -despite the fact that liver donors have normal preoperative liver function (19) -due to unanticipated coagulation derangements from such surgery that could result in a catastrophic neuraxial hematoma making regional techniques controversial for these patients (20). In addition, certain non-narcotic analgesics (NSAIDs) used alone or in combination with neuraxial techniques can be impact modifiers of the coagulation system, and these carry risks that might result in adverse influences on coagulation and platelet-inhibition (increasing the risk of surgical bleeding) and should receive risk-to-benefit consideration in LDLT patients (21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postoperative variables included NRS scores, cumulative sufentanil consumption, the incidence of PONV. Ramsay Sedation Scale scores [ 11 ] collected 5 min after extubation, and 2 h, 4 h, 12 h and 24 h after the operation was evaluated as: [ 1 ] the patient is anxious and agitated or restless, or both; [ 2 ] the patient is co-operative, oriented and tranquil; [ 3 ] the patient responds to commands only; [ 4 ] the patient exhibits brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus; [ 5 ] the patient exhibits a sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus; and [ 6 ] the patient exhibits no response.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidural analgesia, another routinely used analgesic technique, offers equivalent or superior pain scores when compared toconventional systemic opioids. However, its utilizationis limited by perioperative coagulation dysfunction, which is typical in the patients for liver surgery and subsequent catastrophic neurologic injuries resulting from epidural haematoma [ 3 5 ]. In addition, epidural analgesia is independently associated with an increased use of blood transfusions and a longer hospital stay [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The epidural analgesia display properly in conjunction with general anesthesia, has a low rate of complications, with significant improvements in the patient's clinical condition over time [40][41][42][43][44][45]. The other analgesic technique also considered among the highest standards of treatment of acute pain is intrathecal analgesia with morphine.…”
Section: Postoperative Analgesia Fast Track Erasmentioning
confidence: 99%