2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05071.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of empathy measurement tools in nursing: systematic review

Abstract: Most measures have undergone rigorous development and psychometric testing, although none is both psychometrically and conceptually satisfactory. Empathy measures need to cover all relevant domains reflecting users' own perspectives and be tested with appropriate populations in relevant care settings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
100
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
100
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors acknowledge the potential limitations this may have on the findings of the study, and therefore future research validating this version of the measure or developing a bespoke measure would be beneficial. This would also address a previously identified gap in the literature highlighted by Yu and Kirk (2009), who stated that improvements needed to be made in the measurement of empathy, as there was currently no gold-standard tool. A larger study could include development of a more detailed case vignette and support more focused involvement of staff when responding to it, and thus be in a better position to bring about a difference among those exposed.…”
Section: Areas Of Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The authors acknowledge the potential limitations this may have on the findings of the study, and therefore future research validating this version of the measure or developing a bespoke measure would be beneficial. This would also address a previously identified gap in the literature highlighted by Yu and Kirk (2009), who stated that improvements needed to be made in the measurement of empathy, as there was currently no gold-standard tool. A larger study could include development of a more detailed case vignette and support more focused involvement of staff when responding to it, and thus be in a better position to bring about a difference among those exposed.…”
Section: Areas Of Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal consistency is reported at (α = 0.70-0.78) and test-retest reliability is reported over a 60-75-day period (r = 0.61-0.81; Yu & Kirk, 2009).…”
Section: Interpersonal Reactivity Index-adaptedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[13][14][15] The number of qualitative and quantitative research and systematic reviews has been increasing and the study results reveal the need for improvement of nurses' empathic skills and variables (gender, cultural values and clinical specialty experience) that affect empathy skill and nursing education that need to be accounted in future studies. 14,16 Individualized care starts with the interpersonal communication between nurse and patient. Quality of the service given and nurse autonomy are two important elements that are significant for professionalism in the nursing occupation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%