2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of dust extinction and vertical profiles simulated by WRF-Chem with CALIPSO and AERONET over North Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to using a particular dust emission scheme in WRF-Chem, we have chosen AFWA extension to GOCART in our study. A number of other studies using WRF-Chem to model AOD from dust storms have used the AFWA and UoC extensions to GOCART [48] [49] [50]. While used to investigate dust extinction (AOD) over Sahara Desert in North Africa rather than Australia, [37] modelled these coefficients and particle vertical profile in summer 2006 using GOCART, AFWA and UoC in WRF-Chem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to using a particular dust emission scheme in WRF-Chem, we have chosen AFWA extension to GOCART in our study. A number of other studies using WRF-Chem to model AOD from dust storms have used the AFWA and UoC extensions to GOCART [48] [49] [50]. While used to investigate dust extinction (AOD) over Sahara Desert in North Africa rather than Australia, [37] modelled these coefficients and particle vertical profile in summer 2006 using GOCART, AFWA and UoC in WRF-Chem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most desert areas, dust comes from sediments and alluvial deposits found in depressions, sedimentary basins, and ancient valleys. In the WRF-Chem model, dust source function is represented by the availability of loose erodible soil material 78 , 79 , and dust emission is computed as a function of wind energy, soil moisture, and particle size. A similar empirical formula developed 80 is used to calculate the dust emission flux F in the model following expression: where C is a dimensional factor equal to 1 µgs 2 m −5 , S is the source function 64 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, most dust models simply assume constant values of aerodynamic roughness length and soil clay fraction (Ginoux et al, 2001;Tegen et al, 2002;Zender et al, 2003), ignoring their temporal and spatial variability, which may cause uncertainties in the estimated surface friction velocity and threshold friction velocity. During recent decades, with the development of observation technology, detailed information on the surface characteristics appropriate for global and regional models has been provided (Laurent et al, 2005(Laurent et al, , 2008Prigent et al, 2005Prigent et al, , 2012Shangguan et al, 2014;Perlwitz et al, 2015a, b). Therefore, adopting more accurate and detailed soil datasets is expected to improve the dust model performance.…”
Section: R Tian Et Al: a Revised Mineral Dust Emission Scheme In Gementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as stated above, M clay is assumed to be a constant equal to 20 % in the original scheme, which can cause uncertainty in dust prediction. In the improved scheme, we employ the gridded data of clay content from the Global Soil Dataset for use in Earth System Models (GSDE) (Shangguan et al, 2014), which is based on the Digital Soil Map of the World (FAO, 1995(FAO, , 2003 and various regional and national soil databases. Figure 2 shows the updated M clay from Shangguan et al 2014with a horizontal resolution of 2 • × 2.5 • at the global scale.…”
Section: Soil Type and Soil Texture Datamentioning
confidence: 99%