2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2012.09.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of diverse antioxidant activities of Galium aparine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
3
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
21
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were observed [24] in their study on Fagonia olivieri whole plant. However, not in agreement with the study of Bokhari et al [25], where they observed maximum DPPH scavenging activity in aqueous fraction of Gallium aparine .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Similar results were observed [24] in their study on Fagonia olivieri whole plant. However, not in agreement with the study of Bokhari et al [25], where they observed maximum DPPH scavenging activity in aqueous fraction of Gallium aparine .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Comparing the results obtained for the different extracts of G. aparine with those of trolox (positive control), the hydromethanolic extract of the freeze-dried sample was the only one revealing a lower EC 50 value (13.5 and 23 μg/ mL for the extract and the positive control, respectively), in the TBARS inhibition assay. In a study performed with several G. aparine extract fractions, the butanol, methanol, and aqueous fractions revealed DPPH scavenging activity at 61.7, 75, and 58.3 μg/mL, respectively, which represent concentrations ten times lower than those obtained in the present study (Bokhari et al, 2013). On the other hand, in a study performed by Abbasi et al (2015), water and acetone extracts of G. aparine showed approximately 69 and 55% DPPH scavenging activity, respectively, in concentrations of 100 mg/mL dw, but once again, it was not possible to compare these results to those achieved herein because of the methodology discrepancies along with the differences on the results analysis and presentation.…”
Section: Antioxidant Activity and Cytotoxicitycontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…These authors also studied three other Galium species, namely Galium verum, Galium mollugo, and Galium odoratum and despite G. aparine presented the largest variety of phenolic compounds, G. verum was the species revealing the highest total phenolic concentration, followed by G. mollugo, G. aparine, and G. odoratum (894, 31, 21, and 17 mg/100 g dw, respectively). Other studies also evaluated G. aparine water extracts (Abbasi et al, 2015) and aqueous fractions (Bokhari et al, 2013) in terms of total phenolics and the water extracts contained 24 mg GAE/100 g fw, whereas the aqueous fractions revealed a slightly lower amount of 22.1 mg GAE/g of dried fraction.…”
Section: Phenolic Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reducing power capacity is a useful method for measuring antioxidant activities [51]. In this assay, hydroxyl radicals are generated by the reaction of Fe 2+ and H 2 O 2 , and the antioxidant agents reduce the generation of hydroxyl radicals by chelating Fe 2+ [52]. The results of this activity (Table 3) showed that the EOs of the two plants have a comparable reducing capacity against the ferric ion; 14.73±0.25 mg/ml for T. blecherianus and 11.86±0.15 mg/ml for T. riatarum which is lowest than T. serpyllum and T. algeriensis EO (IC 50 = 0.66 µg/ml and 0.68 µg/ml, respectively) [49] and lowest than wild and cultivated T. maroccanus with IC 50 = 139.31±1.08 and 149.41±1.13 µg/ml, respectively [17].…”
Section: Ferric Reducing/antioxidant Power (Frap) Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%