2001
DOI: 10.2307/2695419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Dirichlet Series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Proposition 3.5 can be obtained directly from (2.2) by a straightforward argument consisting of inverting the discrete Fourier transform of m-periodic even sequences (see [3]). The method described in [3] allows one to sum periodic Dirichlet series in general and does not require separate arguments according to the parity of m. However, the approach in [3] does not reveal the regularity of (3.7) and the explicit formula for the inverse of the cosine matrix. In addition, since µ(n) is not periodic, the method does not provide elementary expressions for the x r starting from (2.4), i.e.…”
Section: Solution Of the "Bernoulli System" Of Linear Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Proposition 3.5 can be obtained directly from (2.2) by a straightforward argument consisting of inverting the discrete Fourier transform of m-periodic even sequences (see [3]). The method described in [3] allows one to sum periodic Dirichlet series in general and does not require separate arguments according to the parity of m. However, the approach in [3] does not reveal the regularity of (3.7) and the explicit formula for the inverse of the cosine matrix. In addition, since µ(n) is not periodic, the method does not provide elementary expressions for the x r starting from (2.4), i.e.…”
Section: Solution Of the "Bernoulli System" Of Linear Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our formulas are of such a generality as to allow us to evaluate instances of famous series such as in examples (1) to (4). Notice however that formulas (1) to (3) can be obtained by using results of the first author [3]. This is because the series (1) to (3) are of the form λ j /j n , where {λ j } is a periodic sequence and n ∈ N. Theorem 3 in this note goes beyond the results in [3] by evaluating more general series of the form λ j c j /j n where {λ j } is a periodic sequence, n ∈ N and {c j } is the sequence of Fourier coefficients of a well behaved function.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Notice however that formulas (1) to (3) can be obtained by using results of the first author [3]. This is because the series (1) to (3) are of the form λ j /j n , where {λ j } is a periodic sequence and n ∈ N. Theorem 3 in this note goes beyond the results in [3] by evaluating more general series of the form λ j c j /j n where {λ j } is a periodic sequence, n ∈ N and {c j } is the sequence of Fourier coefficients of a well behaved function. Here is a final example, with c j = 1/(4π 2 j 2 + 1), The generating function of Theorem 1 has applications in the generalization of the Euler-Maclaurin formula presented in [4].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the proof of the following theorems one proceeds as in Balanzario [10], using Theorem 8 and (16).…”
Section: Evaluation By Certain Dirichlet Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%