2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of direct seeding and transplanting in sugar beet for water productivity, yield and quality under different irrigation regimes and planting densities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most importantly, comparing transplanting with direct seeding in both experiments suggest that the RY of sugar beet in the transplanting method was significantly higher than direct seeding in both sites, except the first site in the second experiment (Figure 2). Similar results were reported by Khozaei et al (2020), who showed the transplanting method led to a significant increase (7.7%) in sugar beet yield compared with the direct seeding. Ibrahim et al (2017) also indicated that transplanting sugar beet (45 day old) led to increasing fresh and dry weights of shoot and root, and root length and diameter versus direct seeding.…”
Section: Comparison Of Transplanting With Direct Seedingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Most importantly, comparing transplanting with direct seeding in both experiments suggest that the RY of sugar beet in the transplanting method was significantly higher than direct seeding in both sites, except the first site in the second experiment (Figure 2). Similar results were reported by Khozaei et al (2020), who showed the transplanting method led to a significant increase (7.7%) in sugar beet yield compared with the direct seeding. Ibrahim et al (2017) also indicated that transplanting sugar beet (45 day old) led to increasing fresh and dry weights of shoot and root, and root length and diameter versus direct seeding.…”
Section: Comparison Of Transplanting With Direct Seedingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Increasing IRR significantly increased the root length of sugar beet. Khozaei et al (2020) stated that the root length values ranged from 16.43 to 25.69 cm. Hussein et al (2008) reported that the root length values varied between 16.3-24.0 cm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, higher soil moisture in 2016 led to higher SPAD (vegetation stage) and gas exchange and consequently higher LAI compared to 2015. Interestingly, the transplanting method reduced applied water in a sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris ) field by about 24% and evapotranspiration by 25% as compared with direct seeding [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%