2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2019.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of differentially expressed microRNAs in vitrified oocytes by next generation sequencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We select the Rfam database to annotate the small RNA sequences obtained by sequencing, and find and remove the possible rRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, tRNA, and other non-miRNA sequences as far as possible; (4) miRNA identification: after effective data were obtained, the precursor and genome were compared for miRNA identification; the t -test test was used in this analysis. For the analysis of samples with biological duplicates, the threshold of P ≤ 0.05 was used to screen differentially expressed genes ( Han et al, 2019 ; Jeon et al, 2019 ; Li et al, 2019 ); (5) identification of differentially expressed miRNAs; and (6) prediction of differential miRNA target genes. The data presented in the study are deposited in the GEO respository ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE182429 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We select the Rfam database to annotate the small RNA sequences obtained by sequencing, and find and remove the possible rRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, tRNA, and other non-miRNA sequences as far as possible; (4) miRNA identification: after effective data were obtained, the precursor and genome were compared for miRNA identification; the t -test test was used in this analysis. For the analysis of samples with biological duplicates, the threshold of P ≤ 0.05 was used to screen differentially expressed genes ( Han et al, 2019 ; Jeon et al, 2019 ; Li et al, 2019 ); (5) identification of differentially expressed miRNAs; and (6) prediction of differential miRNA target genes. The data presented in the study are deposited in the GEO respository ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE182429 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, no significant differences were seen in cleavage timing or predictive morphokinetic time intervals between embryos developed from fresh and vitrified oocytes evaluated under time-lapse monitoring [156]. Another point of epigenetic issue, noncoding RNA (miRNA) expression in fresh/vitrified human oocytes was reported in 2019 [157]. At least 22 miRNAs differed between fresh and vitrified oocytes, e.g., miR-134-5p, miR-210-5p, miR-21-3p and miR-465c-5p, which target the PTEN gene (cell apoptosis regulation through oxidative stress pathway) [157].…”
Section: Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another point of epigenetic issue, noncoding RNA (miRNA) expression in fresh/vitrified human oocytes was reported in 2019 [157]. At least 22 miRNAs differed between fresh and vitrified oocytes, e.g., miR-134-5p, miR-210-5p, miR-21-3p and miR-465c-5p, which target the PTEN gene (cell apoptosis regulation through oxidative stress pathway) [157]. However, a small sample size was used in these novel genome reports, and correlation between gene expression and other oocyte quality parameters were rarely determined [155].…”
Section: Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study conducted in mice reported the comparison of miRNA transcriptome in fresh and vitrified oocytes [120]. Twenty-two miRNAs were differentially expressed between the two groups, and most of the target genes regulated by these miRNAs were identified as "metabolic pathway" regulators.…”
Section: Micrornasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, miR-134-5p, miR-210-5p, and miR-21-3p were significantly upregulated, whereas miR-465c-5p was downregulated. The expression of potential target PTEN, regulating cell apoptosis through oxidative stress, was reduced [120].…”
Section: Micrornasmentioning
confidence: 99%