2010
DOI: 10.1080/03067310902871281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of different calibration approaches in pesticide residues analysis in non-fatty food using fast GC-MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A challenge would be to demonstrate the same capabilities for more complex matrices as fruits and vegetables. It is well known that limitations of single quadrupole are more evident when complex matrices are analyzed, especially due to the matrix effects (Hercegová et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A challenge would be to demonstrate the same capabilities for more complex matrices as fruits and vegetables. It is well known that limitations of single quadrupole are more evident when complex matrices are analyzed, especially due to the matrix effects (Hercegová et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to experience in our laboratory, apples are good representative of high sugar and high water content commodities. Therefore, they are used for the preparation of matrix-matched standards [11,27].…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, four types of quantitation methods can be used in pesticide residues analysis to compensate for the matrix effects [ 66 , 67 , 68 ]. For the analysis of EDCs/EDPs the same approaches to eliminate matrix effects in various matrices [ 17 , 41 ] are used: (i) method of standard addition [ 47 , 50 , 58 ]; (ii) use of isotopically labeled internal standards [ 55 , 56 ]; (iii) use of matrix-matched standards [ 45 , 46 , 48 , 49 , 50 ]; and (iv) use of analyte protectants (APs) [ 48 , 49 ]. For matrix-matched standardization the bracketing sequence of samples is recommended for better long term stability.…”
Section: Analysis Of Edpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For matrix-matched standardization the bracketing sequence of samples is recommended for better long term stability. Clean-up of extracts and utilization of retention gap can additionally reduce matrix effects [ 45 , 46 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 69 ].…”
Section: Analysis Of Edpsmentioning
confidence: 99%