2011
DOI: 10.1002/pssc.201100239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of deep levels in In0.53Ga0.47As and GaAs0.5Sb0.5 using low‐frequency noise and RTS noise characterization

Abstract: Quantum‐well photodetectors based on lattice‐matched InGaAs/GaAsSb heterostructures on InP are promising candidates for mid‐infrared detection. However, the dark current in these devices can be elevated by the presence of deep levels. In this work, both bulk and interfacial deep levels in MBE‐grown homojunctions and heterojunctions are studied experimentally using low‐frequency noise spectroscopy and random telegraph signal (RTS) characterization. Several bulk and interface‐related levels have been identified … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, consistent results from LFNS and DLTS were reported [44,45]. Unfortunately, despite its many advantages, LFNS without additional random telegraph signal analysis does not allow direct information about the trap type (if it is donor-or acceptor-like) to be obtained [41,46]. Moreover, there are some difficulties in making a direct connection between E a av and the relative trapping state energy value, E t , owing to the usually-unknown thermal dependence of f 0 .…”
Section: Low-frequency Noise Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Indeed, consistent results from LFNS and DLTS were reported [44,45]. Unfortunately, despite its many advantages, LFNS without additional random telegraph signal analysis does not allow direct information about the trap type (if it is donor-or acceptor-like) to be obtained [41,46]. Moreover, there are some difficulties in making a direct connection between E a av and the relative trapping state energy value, E t , owing to the usually-unknown thermal dependence of f 0 .…”
Section: Low-frequency Noise Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Defects in this device structure were evaluated using both DLTS and LFNS. For the LFNS study, the frequency‐weighted noise spectra were taken to be expressed as [7, 10] 2πfthinmathspaceSV=Ai)(2πfthinmathspaceτ0i/)(1+2πfτ0i2+2πB+2πCfwhere the three contributions to the measured noise spectra correspond to Lorentzians of generation‐recombination (G‐R) noise with carrier lifetimes of τ 0 i , 1/ f noise, and white noise, respectively. Devices with areas of 4.91 × 10 −4 cm 2 were measured over a temperature range from 100 to 300 K as a function of forward current density.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For E 2 , traps with similar energy and cross‐section have been observed in lattice‐matched QW structures [7]. Since LFNS is not able to resolve the ‘type’ (either hole or electron) of a trap, this defect could either be a donor‐like level in InGaAs with energy 0.13 eV below the conduction band edge (after compensating for an electron ground state energy of 0.12 eV) and cross‐section of 1.14 × 10 −16 cm 2 , or an acceptor‐like level in GaAsSb with energy 0.20–0.22 eV above the valence band edge and cross‐section of 1.08 × 10 −17 cm 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations