1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9120(78)90168-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of continuous solvent extraction of organic acids from biological fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very few methods have been used to extract SA from biological fluids prior to GC/MS analysis: one method requires a relatively long time span, while necessitating lyophilization and a liquid partition chromatography technique [13], whereas the others are based on liquid-liquid extraction [12,23,25]. Solvent extraction, on the other hand, is simple and we were able to confirm the efficiency of this known method [10,26] by comparing, in a triplicate assay, the peak areas of SA standards obtained after solvent extraction with those obtained after evaporation of pure oximated standards prepared in methanol (unextracted standards). The mean efficiency of extraction compared to the unextracted sample was 76% (data not shown).…”
Section: Sample Treatments and Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Very few methods have been used to extract SA from biological fluids prior to GC/MS analysis: one method requires a relatively long time span, while necessitating lyophilization and a liquid partition chromatography technique [13], whereas the others are based on liquid-liquid extraction [12,23,25]. Solvent extraction, on the other hand, is simple and we were able to confirm the efficiency of this known method [10,26] by comparing, in a triplicate assay, the peak areas of SA standards obtained after solvent extraction with those obtained after evaporation of pure oximated standards prepared in methanol (unextracted standards). The mean efficiency of extraction compared to the unextracted sample was 76% (data not shown).…”
Section: Sample Treatments and Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The organic layers were collected and dried using Savant speed vac plus SC110A with refrigerated vapor trap vacuum centrifuge system. Finally, organic acid residues were dissolved in pyridine and derivatization was performed with an equal volume of N,O‐Bis (trimethylsilyl) trifluroacetamide with 1% trimethyclorosilane (BSTFA) for 45 minutes at 95°C in a temperature block (Cohn et al 1978). The sample (1μl) was injected in the gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer (GC/MS) using the splitless mode.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%