1978
DOI: 10.2527/jas1978.46132x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Concentrated Hemicellulose Extract as Cattle Feed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ammonium spent sulphite liquor (Salo and Puumala 1978) and spent sulphite liquor (Chang et al 1977), which contain more lignosulphonates than wood molasses have been found to decrease the digestibility of forages and soyabean-alfalfa substrate in vitro. In contrast, relative to cane molasses wood molasses (Masonex) has been found to have positive effect on cellulose digestibility in steers (Crawford et al 1978). The wood molasses used in the present experiment contains, however, more lignosulphonates than Masonex.…”
Section: Digestibility Of Rationscontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Ammonium spent sulphite liquor (Salo and Puumala 1978) and spent sulphite liquor (Chang et al 1977), which contain more lignosulphonates than wood molasses have been found to decrease the digestibility of forages and soyabean-alfalfa substrate in vitro. In contrast, relative to cane molasses wood molasses (Masonex) has been found to have positive effect on cellulose digestibility in steers (Crawford et al 1978). The wood molasses used in the present experiment contains, however, more lignosulphonates than Masonex.…”
Section: Digestibility Of Rationscontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The effect of wood molasses was similar that reported by others. Crawford et al (1978) found the feeding value of wood molasses from the Masonite process to be equal to cane molasses at a level of 10 % in the diet. When spent sulphite liquor (SSL) was fed at levels of 8 and 12°/o on DM basis, no differences were detected between SSL groups and the control (Chang et al 1977).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the proxy traits, the measurement of SFT and REA was on the 12th rib in most publications except for Murphy & Loerch (1994, 6, 7, 8th rib); Crawford, Anthony, and Harris (1978) and Rossi, Loerch, and Fluharty (2000) who did not define the rib number. The MAR was measured on the 12th rib but was expressed according to different scoring scales depending on the year of publication.…”
Section: Response and Independent Variables Of The Statistical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%