2022
DOI: 10.3201/eid2803.211885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Commercially Available High-Throughput SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assays for Serosurveillance and Related Applications

Abstract: On February 4, 2020, pursuant to Section 564(b)(1)(C) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) (21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3), the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) determined that there is a public health emergency that has a significant potential to affect national security or the health and security of United States citizens living abroad, and that involves the virus that causes Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (the virus was later named SARS-CoV-2). 1 On March 27, 2020, o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(28 reference statements)
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suspected that the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate estimated by the seroprevalence of anti-N antibody would be higher than the rate indicated by the PCR-based diagnoses due to the existence of asymptomatically or mildly infected individuals whose cases may not have been detected since they never underwent testing by PCR analysis or antigen test. The anti-N ECLIA used here is a high sensitivity method widely detecting IgG, IgA, and IgM, it has advantage for the use of serosurveillance [ 26 ]. Indeed, the anti-N ECLIA-based infection rates revealed in the present analyses, i.e., 2.1% and 3.9% for August and December 2021, were respectively higher than the rates 0.84% (46,381 cases/5,465 thousand people in Hyogo prefecture as of August 6, 2021) and 1.4% (78,898 cases/5,465 thousand people in Hyogo prefecture as of December 8, 2021) estimated from the reported cases based on PCR diagnoses [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suspected that the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate estimated by the seroprevalence of anti-N antibody would be higher than the rate indicated by the PCR-based diagnoses due to the existence of asymptomatically or mildly infected individuals whose cases may not have been detected since they never underwent testing by PCR analysis or antigen test. The anti-N ECLIA used here is a high sensitivity method widely detecting IgG, IgA, and IgM, it has advantage for the use of serosurveillance [ 26 ]. Indeed, the anti-N ECLIA-based infection rates revealed in the present analyses, i.e., 2.1% and 3.9% for August and December 2021, were respectively higher than the rates 0.84% (46,381 cases/5,465 thousand people in Hyogo prefecture as of August 6, 2021) and 1.4% (78,898 cases/5,465 thousand people in Hyogo prefecture as of December 8, 2021) estimated from the reported cases based on PCR diagnoses [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that lower cutoffs could be considered, although further research is needed to define these alternative cutoffs. A recent analysis of UK serosurvey samples recommended a threshold of 0.47 for the detection of vaccine breakthrough infections using the Roche NC assay (11,17). As commercial manufacturers and FDA tend to maximize specificity when setting assay thresholds, sensitivity may be compromised to achieve optimal specificity; thus, specimens with gray zone reactivity likely represent infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies utilize lower throughput in-house assays such as ELISAs (7,8), while other studies utilize commercial higher throughput assays from major manufacturers such as Abbott, Roche, Euroimmun, Wantai, and Ortho Clinical Diagnostics (5,9,10). For optimal selection and use of assays in serosurveillance, three performance characteristics are key: sensitivity, specificity, and durability of antibody detection (11). While most commercially available SARS-CoV-2 serological assays have good sensitivity and specificity to support clinical diagnosis of recent infection, durability of antibody detection varies considerably (11,12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CIMA, AdviseDx, Abbott) that detects IgG antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein. At a threshold of 50 S/C units, we have previously shown this assay to have a sensitivity of 94.0% in 208 non-hospitalized PCR-positive convalescent individuals, and its specificity is >99% [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%