Evaluation of climate model simulations in representing the precipitation non‐stationarity by considering observational uncertainties

Abstract

The reliability of climate model simulations in representing the precipitation changes is one of the preconditions for climate‐change impact studies. However, the observational uncertainties hinder the robust evaluation of these climate model simulations. The goal of the present study is to evaluate the capacities of climate model simulations in representing the precipitation non‐stationarity in consideration of observational uncertainties. The mean of multiple observations from five observational precipitation datasets is used as a reference to quantify the uncertainty of observed precipitation and to evaluate the performance of climate model simulations. The non‐stationarity of precipitation was represented using the mean and variance of annual total precipitation and annual maximum daily precipitation for the 1982–2015 period. The results show that the spatial distributions of annual and extreme precipitation are similar for various observational datasets, while there has less agreement in the variance changes of extreme precipitation. Climate models are capable of representing the spatial distributions of the annual and extreme precipitation amounts at the global scales. In terms of the non‐stationarity, climate model simulations are capable of capturing the large‐scale spatial pattern of the trend in mean for annual precipitation. On the contrary, the simulations are less reliable in reproducing the change of extreme precipitation, as well as the trend of variance for annual precipitation. Overall, climate models are more reliable in simulating the mean of precipitation than the variance, and they are more reliable in simulating annual precipitation than extreme. Besides, the uncertainties of precipitation for both observations and simulations are much larger in monsoon regions than in other regions. This study suggests that considering observational uncertainties is necessary when using observational datasets as the reference to project future climate change and assess the impact of climate change on environments.

Changes in extreme precipitation events in the Zambezi River basins based on CORDEX‐CORE models: Part I—Evaluation of historical simulation

“…The OBS-ENS was used as reference data for the statistical metrics applied in this study. Several studies (Abiodun et al, 2020;Ilori and Balogun, 2021;Wan et al, 2021) used the OBS-ENS for model evaluation.…”

“…The increase in the impact of climate extremes in recent decades has attracted significant attention from governments and human societies (Ayugi et al ., 2021; Wan et al ., 2021). In addition to changes in mean temperature and precipitation, global warming has increased the magnitude and frequency of climate extremes in recent decades (e.g., extreme precipitation events; IPCC, 2013; Guo et al ., 2016; Xu et al ., 2021; Khadka et al ., 2021).…”

Biases Beyond the Mean in CMIP6 Extreme Precipitation: A Global Investigation

“…Gridded observational datasets are widely used in the literature to validate and assess the climate model products (Contractor et al., 2020; J. Liu et al., 2019; Tarek et al., 2020; Wan et al., 2020). Three observational gridded precipitation datasets were used in this study, that are the Climate Prediction Center unified gauge‐based analysis of daily precipitation (CPC), the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) daily precipitation, and the Multi‐source Weighted Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP) daily precipitation.…”

Towards a historical precipitation database for West Africa: Overview, quality control and harmonization

“…Although more than 100,000 precipitation stations are operated by national hydrological and meteorological services (NHMS) and other institutions worldwide, long‐term observations from precipitation gauges on the ground are often difficult to obtain from NHMS. Many climatological studies and related disciplines therefore use information from station‐based global and continental climate databases and their associated gridded precipitation products in data‐scarce regions (e.g., Moron et al ., 2010; Ceccherini et al ., 2017; Wan et al ., 2021). The information in these archives is usually free‐of‐charge for noncommercial purposes and can be easily accessed via FTP servers or comfortable web interfaces.…”