2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/eeeic.2015.7165211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of centralized and distributed microgrid topologies and comparison to Open Energy Systems (OES)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number and nature of these modules, as well as the microgrid topologies, vary greatly [1][2][3]. Presently, the modules interconnection is predominantly done using AC buses, but DC microgrids are expected to increase in the coming years [4]. In particular, DC microgrids are very versatile for integration of renewable energy sources and non conventional storage devices, such as photovoltaic panels, wind turbines, lithium batteries, flow batteries, supercapacitors, fuel cells and many others (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number and nature of these modules, as well as the microgrid topologies, vary greatly [1][2][3]. Presently, the modules interconnection is predominantly done using AC buses, but DC microgrids are expected to increase in the coming years [4]. In particular, DC microgrids are very versatile for integration of renewable energy sources and non conventional storage devices, such as photovoltaic panels, wind turbines, lithium batteries, flow batteries, supercapacitors, fuel cells and many others (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the centralized control requires high initial cost and needs a widespread scheming; however, it provides better efficiency. In the meantime, the centralized network can be implemented step by step from the bottom levels to the top levels [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], the authors examined two implemented microgrid topologies, one centralized and one distributed model, which combine solar panels and batteries for 20 residential houses. In [14], the authors provided an optimal solution for dispatching of the local resources in the medium voltage (MV) microgrids that temporary or permanently operate in islanded mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless there are few studies that compare solar PVHS and CPVS for rural electrification. For instance, reference [4] describes a CPVS approach as the best option for a particular off-grid application, but it requires extended planning and high initial investments, whereas the PVHS approach can be gradually built bottom-up. Reference [5] studies the economic viability of the implementation of a CPVS in villages with a large number of dwellings, densely populated and located on flat terrains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%