2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of carbopol as an adjuvant on the effectiveness of progressive atrophic rhinitis vaccine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the innate immunity profile of SPA09 in the MIMIC® PTE module has some differences when compared to AddaVax™, a commercial MF59-like benchmark adjuvant, this profile was in accordance with in vivo observations in animal models. Taken together, these data confirm the value of SPA09 as a potential human vaccine adjuvant candidate based on a low inflammatory profile with innate immune activation, which could lead to T cell responses and antibody secretion as reported for other adjuvants with similar composition ( Zhang et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the innate immunity profile of SPA09 in the MIMIC® PTE module has some differences when compared to AddaVax™, a commercial MF59-like benchmark adjuvant, this profile was in accordance with in vivo observations in animal models. Taken together, these data confirm the value of SPA09 as a potential human vaccine adjuvant candidate based on a low inflammatory profile with innate immune activation, which could lead to T cell responses and antibody secretion as reported for other adjuvants with similar composition ( Zhang et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Among the adjuvant-active PAAs, one can find plain PAAs ( Diamantstein et al, 1971 ; Hilgers et al, 1998a ), PAA dendrimers ( Zaman et al, 2010 , 2011 ), PAA alkyl esters ( Hilgers et al, 2000 , 1998b ; Tifrea et al, 2011 ) and the crosslinked PAAs ( i.e. Carbomers™ and Carbopols™) that are present in various experimental and commercial veterinary vaccines ( Angelos et al, 2016 ; Deville et al, 2011 , 2008 ; Gelfi et al, 2010 ; Gualandi et al, 1988 ; Hoogland et al, 2006 ; Kim et al, 2012 ; Liu et al, 2005 ; Mair et al, 2015 ; Minke et al, 2006 ; Mumford et al, 1994 ; Tollersrud et al, 2002 ; Zhang et al, 2018 ). Potent adjuvant systems were also obtained by combining Carbopol™ with oil-in-water emulsions ( Dey et al, 2012 ; Lai et al, 2012 ; Sastry et al, 2017 ) or by co-formulating Carbomer™ with lecithin in an adjuvant system termed Adjuplex™ (Advanced BioAjuvants LLC) ( Chakrabarti et al, 2013 ; Gasper et al, 2016 ; Sastry et al, 2017 ; Wegmann et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the immunogenicities of CAV-2 vaccines featuring adjuvants developed by SEPPIC (France) and Lubrizol (USA). The Cabopol-adjuvanted vaccine afforded slightly higher specific IgG antibody and VNA titers in guinea pigs, as was also the case for the PRRS MLV and atrophic rhinitis vaccines; Cabopol induces rapid differentiation of IFN-r-producing cells (NK and CD4 + T cells) and also drives T cell differentiation [13,21]. The Korean veterinary standard states that a CAV vaccine should induce a VNA titer of at least 120 in dogs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We passaged APQP1701 in MDCK cells in medium containing 5 mM urea, triggering mutations including the APQA1701-40P six-amino deletion in E1b-19K; this mutation may critically distinguish parent or field CAV-2 strains from the mutant; the mutation is a 'mark-er' of the vaccine. Both Cabopol and the IMS gel are safe and effective adjuvants [13,14,21]. Selection of an optimal adjuvant is essential when seeking to enhance the immune response to vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were cultured on brain-heart infusion agar (Difco Labora-D. Quintanar-Guerrero et al tories, Detroit, MI, USA) and incubated aerobically overnight at 37˚C. Pasteurella multocida type A was identified by standard procedures [15] [16]. The biomass was inactive with formaldehyde 0.5% for 12 hours by washing the plates with PBS, and the bacterial concentration was standardized spectrophotometrically (660 nm) at 10 8 CFU/ml.…”
Section: Bacterial Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%