2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of cake filtration biological reactors (CFBR) vs. membrane biological reactors (MBR) in a pilot scale plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering all runs, the bench scale SFD MBR effectively removed suspended solids and organic matter, producing a very good quality effluent. The average effluent quality observed during the four runs confirms previous studies on aerobic SFD MBR treating municipal wastewater [ 5 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. In this study, it was remarkable that high flux ( Table 2 ) and low effluent turbidity ( Table 3 ) were stably obtained during long-term experiments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Considering all runs, the bench scale SFD MBR effectively removed suspended solids and organic matter, producing a very good quality effluent. The average effluent quality observed during the four runs confirms previous studies on aerobic SFD MBR treating municipal wastewater [ 5 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. In this study, it was remarkable that high flux ( Table 2 ) and low effluent turbidity ( Table 3 ) were stably obtained during long-term experiments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Nevertheless, a very important parameter shared by the different fouling mechanisms is surely represented by the average size of the membrane pores, since it affects the balance between internal and external deposition. In this context, the cake layer deposition represents a further key factor affecting membrane fouling and the consequent permeate flux reduction [ 48 ]. The "biological membrane" constituted by the cake layer deposited on the membrane surface can positively operate as a pre-filter [ 49 , 50 ] or can negatively affect total membrane fouling [ 23 , 28 , 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Introduction: General Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the generality of cases, the membrane fouling proceeds in two steps: the initial membrane fouling caused by pore blockage and/or pore constriction followed by the long-term fouling arising from the filter cake gradually accumulating on the membrane surface (Kim et al, 1993;Tracey and Davis, 1994;Madaeni and Fane, 1996;Huang and Morrissey, 1998;Blanpain-Avet et al, 1999;Altman et al, 1999;Lim and Bai, 2003;Purkait et al, 2004Purkait et al, , 2005Wang and Tarabara, 2008;Juang et al, 2010;Mohd Amin et al, 2010;Ozdemir et al, 2012). The initial pore blocking frequently causes the irreversible fouling of membranes, resulting in the decrease in the efficiency of membrane cleaning.…”
Section: Developments Of Consecutive Combined Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%