EENLY aware of the serious problems threatening the very existence of human civilization, psychologists have shown a growing concern with the contributions they can make to the solution of social problems. That psychologists in large numbers are in fact deeply concerned about such problems is evident in many ways. One need only look at any issue of the American Psychologist or at the annual convention program of the APA to find references to topics ranging from ecology to racism and sexism, or from the education of inner-city children to the prevention of wars between nations. Several discussions center around the more general question of the mechanisms whereby psychologists can make their most effective contributions, such as basic research, technology, or social action.Like the rest of humanity, psychologists display wide individual differences in both their professional and their personal orientations. This is not only an incontrovertible fact, but also, I maintain, a desirable condition. It is both unrealistic and presumptuous to expect representatives of a single psychological specialty, or members of a single discipline, or persons in a single category, however characterized, to possess the magic formula that will save humanity. I should now like to examine some implications of diversity-with regard to psychology in relation to other disciplines, as well as within psychology itself.
MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO SOCIAL PROBLEMSCurrent social problems are complex and their solutions are not the exclusive province of any one field of expertise. Psychology has no monopoly on human behavior. Over the centuries, many other